9/11 Un-debunked: Introduction

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,206
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 11, 2009

The 9/11 Un-debunked series is a series of videos made in response to the videos posted by RKOwens4 and also to respond to the claims of other so-called 9/11 debunkers. The series does not address every subject raised by RKOwens4 in his videos, only the most important ones. The series mainly focuses on the collapse of the WTC and Building 7. The series does address the issues of the Pentagon and Flight 93 some what. Other issues are not raised simply because either the theories have no merit and have been debunked or the issue has been debated to the point where all the information has been exhausted. This video series does not endorse any "missile" or "no planes" theories. It focuses on scientific evidence based from the work of Dr. Steven Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan. It is strongly encouraged to use this video series to answer any of the claims made by so-called "debunkers." Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself. I DO NOT OWN THE MUSIC OR PICTURES SHOWN IN THIS VIDEO SERIES.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (citizenfor911truth1)

  • Apart from a loony missile theory, what else do You see fit to be debunked, that He also debunks?...

  • I care very much about what happened at the Pentagon and Flight 93 and I even have made a video for each of them.Again,there are a lot of theories I don't agree with,so why would I bother defending or addresing them?In terms of theories that should be debunked, I think theories like the "pod" or "fake calls" theories hold little to no merit. It's interesting that RKOwens says there are over 100 theories that are wrong, but he only has about 50 videos addressing them. Where are the other 50+vids?

see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @GGcaptmandrake just to comment on nano thermite this proves it was an inside job then because only people in our gov researching it had access to it and it was indeed found

  • Debunker's say "It would have taken months and months to set up the explosives to take down the twin towers!" Ignorantés, you know what? Then how can fire bring down the god damn buildings!

  • @citizenfor911truth1 The buildings fell, though the total time it took them to fall was clouded, literally. It was impossible to see the complete collapse through the debris cloud. Which btw, fell faster then the building. "Super free fall"?

    Building 7's collapse started internally long before the outer shell finally had nothing to hold it up. The destruction appears to have gone: Gas line rupture > Gas generators > transformers > support columns > internal gutting > external collapse.

  • And: if you watch RKOwens' video on Thermite; You would see that he mentions that the chemical elements of thermite, are common to construction matrerials! You can't NOT have chem signiatures of thermite at ground zero, or any other construction site! You oughtta consider NOT living in a home anymore, because there is thermite in Your house!

  • Actually: NANO-THERMITE, was only in it's research phase at the time of 9/11! Explosions out of the windows?...You mean the already burning jet fuel, that recieved a sudden burst of air from the crushed windows?...And how is it exactly, that the North tower falling at a rate of 22.02 seconds, and the south falling at a rate of 15.75 seconds is an incredible speed?...Not to mention: that the three buildngs that collapsed that day, ALL recieved catostrophic damage to them!

  • I think the fact that the buildings fell at increible speeds, the fact that residues of thermite have been found, the fact that actual nanothermite has been found, the fact that Building 7 fell in complete free-fall for 100 feet, that fact that explosions can be seen busting out of the towers, are just some theories I think have not been debunked.

  • Incidentally: what are the "main" WTC theories that have been debunked, that You think haven't actually been debunked?...

  • How many total video's have You made?...This is tit for tat stuff here!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more