9/11 Un-debunked: Introduction
Uploader Comments (citizenfor911truth1)
All Comments (22)
-
@GGcaptmandrake just to comment on nano thermite this proves it was an inside job then because only people in our gov researching it had access to it and it was indeed found
-
Debunker's say "It would have taken months and months to set up the explosives to take down the twin towers!" Ignorantés, you know what? Then how can fire bring down the god damn buildings!
-
@citizenfor911truth1 The buildings fell, though the total time it took them to fall was clouded, literally. It was impossible to see the complete collapse through the debris cloud. Which btw, fell faster then the building. "Super free fall"?
Building 7's collapse started internally long before the outer shell finally had nothing to hold it up. The destruction appears to have gone: Gas line rupture > Gas generators > transformers > support columns > internal gutting > external collapse.
-
And: if you watch RKOwens' video on Thermite; You would see that he mentions that the chemical elements of thermite, are common to construction matrerials! You can't NOT have chem signiatures of thermite at ground zero, or any other construction site! You oughtta consider NOT living in a home anymore, because there is thermite in Your house!
-
Actually: NANO-THERMITE, was only in it's research phase at the time of 9/11! Explosions out of the windows?...You mean the already burning jet fuel, that recieved a sudden burst of air from the crushed windows?...And how is it exactly, that the North tower falling at a rate of 22.02 seconds, and the south falling at a rate of 15.75 seconds is an incredible speed?...Not to mention: that the three buildngs that collapsed that day, ALL recieved catostrophic damage to them!
-
I think the fact that the buildings fell at increible speeds, the fact that residues of thermite have been found, the fact that actual nanothermite has been found, the fact that Building 7 fell in complete free-fall for 100 feet, that fact that explosions can be seen busting out of the towers, are just some theories I think have not been debunked.
-
Incidentally: what are the "main" WTC theories that have been debunked, that You think haven't actually been debunked?...
-
How many total video's have You made?...This is tit for tat stuff here!
Apart from a loony missile theory, what else do You see fit to be debunked, that He also debunks?...
GGcaptmandrake 2 years ago
I care very much about what happened at the Pentagon and Flight 93 and I even have made a video for each of them.Again,there are a lot of theories I don't agree with,so why would I bother defending or addresing them?In terms of theories that should be debunked, I think theories like the "pod" or "fake calls" theories hold little to no merit. It's interesting that RKOwens says there are over 100 theories that are wrong, but he only has about 50 videos addressing them. Where are the other 50+vids?
citizenfor911truth1 2 years ago