Introduction of Prince Charles and Camilla, Royal Visit, Nov. 2nd 2009 , St. John's Nfld
Top Comments
All Comments (12)
-
@anglocelt45, Fu..ck U, your shity Royals & your sad filthy CUNT-RY!!! Canadians must be out of their mind to have the picture of that filthy ugly whore on their money or be so stupid to even think that a little sad state could be their masters. FU..CK Britain & everything British including UUUUUUUUU.
-
This mother fu..cker tampon lovin faggot Prince is a piece of SHIT. His whore mother the Queen of darkness is the head of the greediest filthiest most racist royal establishment on earth. This mafia family should all be exposed. Fu..k Britain & itis filthy Royls.
-
This is the story of a pathetic weak man, who enjoyed an experienced womans bedroom skills and this vile poisonous woman had the ability to manipulate the weak man. Charles also obviously didn't think camilla as wifely material in the seventies. IF he did he wouldn't have used her like a common prostitute at Broadlands that Uncle Mountbatten graciously supplied for them for trysts. Charles apparently listened to and agreed with Mountbatten's assessment of Camilla as only prostitute material.
-
I wouldn't change a monarchy into a dictatorship obviously!!! but to a democracy! I think we all learned from Hitler (except for a few nut jobs)
-
It is so nice to see our brothers and sisters in the Kingdom of Canada give a warm Canadian welcome to The Duke and Duchess of Rothesay.
-
Monarchies are great fun. In Monty Python's Holy Grail, Arthur asks the serf how he knows that Arthur is a king and he answers "because you're not all covered in shit like the rest of us" . Royal bashers are no fun at all.
-
they are wrong all their wealth was made from blood money
-
About a hundred or more years ago the world figured out Monarchies are wrong. Again, why are we still promoting it? Nothing against Charles and Camille as they are good people - but just people
guystoners
About 100 yrs ago politicians ousted many monarchies, and there followed, Hitler (44 million deaths), Stalin (20million), Lenin (?), Ceausescu (?), Pol Pot, Mao (40), Saddam (?) Franco (?) etc.
Why change a system that works to a political system that has failed w/wide?.
Britanica76 2 years ago 4
It was certainly interesting to watch, but the coverage--especially by CBC--was not that great. I thought that Harper's and Williams' speeches were not all that great, and they both implied that Charles is foreign royalty when in fact he will be the King of Canada, a citizen of this country. All of this republican innuendo is quite dismaying.
KenGS333 2 years ago 3