WACLA facilitates scientific discourse w/ Gregg Roberts and Priya Vashishta

WACLA facilitates scientific discourse w/ Gregg Roberts and Priya Vashita (10.14.09)

This was not just ground up rust and aluminum that were laying next to each other as he suggests.

This was rhomboidal crystalline grains of Fe2O3 measuring consistently 100 nm across, intimately mixed with hexagonal aluminum platelets 1000 nm across and only 40 nm thick. These two particles were held in a well-mixed configuration by a solidified gel solution containing additional fuel. This is NOT common to buildings!!

And the nano-scale allows the reaction to proceed at much lower temps.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• WACLA
• facilitates
• scientific
• discourse
• w/
• Gregg
• Roberts
• and
• Priya
• Vashita
• (10.14.09)

[doremi9]

It makes no sense that it would just suddenly fail catastrophically so quickly and symmetrically. The official story just stinks. See 911 Revisited online and see Graeme MacQueen's youtube on explosive evidence (above and beyond what videos and photos show)

[doremi9]

Fires don't create pyroclastic dusts clouds as seen in all the videos and it makes no sense to have a symmetrical debris field when the plane on the second tower hit near the corner of the building. The symmetry of the collapse itself is uncanny, the building just peels itself down, ejecting beams and materials in all four directions. Although the planes did cause some local damage near the top of the buildings, what about the structure below it? It is still intact, not damaged by anything.

[DanUuNoel]

NIST, uncertain? Their reports on the twin towers and WTC7, indeed, contain many statements professing uncertainty, ignorance and conjecture.

Would Bill have read some of them? Wow...

Let him keep reading. But let him be warned that the more he reads them, the more he'll understand that they were little more than farcical coverups.

Love,

[DanUuNoel]

True because I say so? That's preposterous. The twin towers were demolished because the videos show that unambiguously and because abundant data confirmed it later on.

Love,

[DanUuNoel]

Debris field, not symmetrical? Bill has not read FEMA's report on the quasi-circular perimeter of WTC 1 & 2's debris field. Not to mention the rare symmetry of WTC7's debris.

But again, faithkeeping and accepting reality are often incompatible.

Love,

[BillBJJ78]

Who said fires create pyroclastic clouds? The problem with the truther assumption that the cloud is concrete is that it ignores other components of the building including the gypsum board. The debris field is not symmetrical. If that was the case there would have been no damage to surrounding buildings. The collapse was not symmetrical. Numerous videos show structural components still standing after the debris field clears. The collapse began and continued due to floor by floor additions.

[BillBJJ78]

Chandler likes to pretend he got hem to admit something when the fact is that they just needed to discuss it in further detail. Another twoof claim w/o evidence.

They actually do explain this, but you like most twoofers don't bother to read. See NCSTAR 1-9 p. 606. they do admit that there are uncertain elements. But as yo are obviously unaware on many accounts, that's how science is.

[BillBJJ78]

watch?v=FTk58sO6S24

"The firefighters are paid off" (J. Bermas)

"Like I have stated before people such as yourselves are revealed to be one of two things, government agents on a payroll or brainwashed morons who refuse to accept the truth" (J. Bermas)

"Mark Roberts is CIA" (D. Avery)

"Zdenek P. Bazant: Alpha Shill for the Official WTC Collapse Story"(covertoperations. blogspot. com)

[BillBJJ78]

"what or who convinced..."

Is that even relevant? Again, in many conspiracy theories, the bulk of academia stays silent. In fact the twoof movement has been uniquely incompetent to present a list of opinions as evidence in a science based argument. As usual you are bringing red herrings to the table. But lets think about what we can prove.

Govt intimidating academia? I've seen no such evidence.

Twoofers intimidating, harassing, & slandering? You betcha.

[BillBJJ78]

OK Dan, notice you first start off saying countless professionals now you're saying it's a fraction.Could it be that twoof is blustering numbers to make a point that is irrelevant to begin with? The reason you can assume that a smaller fraction believes the OS over your mojo is because intelligent ppl don't try to substitute science with a list of names. It's a classic appeal to popularity/authority. Fallacy wins again! ROFL!

[DanUuNoel]

Bill: "a small fraction of the relevant community believes [the demolitions]." Not quite true; rather, "a small fraction of the relevant community affirms the demolitions, and a smaller fraction still affirms the official story, while the remaining majority avoids the controversy like the plague."

Back to a fundamental question: what or who convinced the majority to stay silent on the largest and most spectacular structural failures ever?

Love,

[DanUuNoel]

Well, after some high-school physics teacher pointed out an anomaly in their report, NIST concluded that the top part of WTC7 fell in free fall for 2 seconds.

Interestingly, their report does not explain which phenomenon made this possible.

Love,