Henrik Svensmark on Global Warming (part 5)

Scientist Henrik Svensmark on Global Warming.
You can find more information about Svensmarks ideas under his wikipedia-profile:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrik_Svensmark
just follow some of the links on the page.


If any of you people wants to download this video, then feel free to do so. Just use this site:
http://keepvid.com/

You can download it if:
a) you want to dispute svensmarks claims, by cutting these videoes into to smaller pieces and then be critical of his viewpoints.
or
b) if you agree with svensmark and want to cut some of what he says into your own videos with your own text, pictures and ideas.
or
c) if you just want to mirror these 5 videoes, then feel free to do so.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Henrik
• Svensmark
• on
• Global
• Warming
• potholer54
• potholer54debunks
• climate
• change
• co2
• carbon
• dioxide
• science
• al
• gore
• An
• Inconvenient
• Truth

[toranacar]

FANTASTIC DUCUMENTARY

[elbuggo]

YES!

[SuperZorba007]

it is verry arrogant, to bielieve that our planet is NOT reacting to the rest of the cosmos! Ofcourse there is much to be proven, before the theory is settled, but this is realy a big step forward! We all know that a cloud before the sun tempers the temperature, en now we know what makes the clouds[ It is proven bij experiments, over and over again] So it must be true!

I hope that the believers of G.W. rediside there opinion, and start acting like him!

[jiin5993]

For people who think this settles the science: In the time that you all took to watch this documentary, you could've also read numerous scientific papers (including Svensmark's) of competent climate scientists. But maybe you don't want to get a fair overview of the research done as much as you want your own opinion to be vindicated. In short: variation of cosmic ray intensity does not correlate with the warming. This is just one scientist among many with a hypothesis that hasn't been proven yet.

[banvir99999]

@johnsenkenn I agree. Al Gore has made hundreds of millions off of his global warming scam. These guys are not doing it for the money because they can't make a profit out of it. These guys have clearly written there research into history and we need this to go global and educate the world.

[johnsenkenn]

This is blowing the feet away under the climate scammers. Which means it blows their ideology reason behind the global warming scam away.

[PandoraLeigh]

Thumbs up for thinking outside the box

[Warhead3000]

@tftftf Still awaiting your comments and refernces. Also Cern have now taken up the CLOUD project (look it up) and please report back how CERN thinks that it is important enough to justify and research. nit C02. So yess after all my comments, Phil Jones is still a dickhead at best and mostly a criminal mostly

[Warhead3000]

Well I hope that acyually scientishts will rewiew the data for the truth and realism on climate change becasue this is real

[Warhead3000]

@tftftf Rep no wonder it's spam as you said it before, get a life or real data

[Warhead3000]

Just to say this really should be looked at and they have been verified as there is a verified a 79% sunspot effect on temperate chance VS a 22% on the C02 driving temperature chance on the planet, which oservationally is the correct scientific ratioanlle which do you as an intelegence think is driving temperature change on the planet ??? a 22 % chance or a 79% chance???

[Warhead3000]

Sureley, science and life is about the scientific process and if it is right it should hold true in the light of falling temps even though C02 represents only a 22% correlation of temps on Earth VS a Sunsport Correlation of 79% when does the sience happen or come into effect. For fuck sake it is pretty basick considering the lack of warming the the last 15 years. This is really cround breaking. Others will follow , given time because C02 is not the driver