Hakkinen V Schumacher 1990
Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
Macau is fantastic
-
just to clarify, hakkinen had no need to overtake, as this was a two part race, and he had several second gap from the previous race. So should he have just followed Schumacher until the end of the race, he would have won the whole thing. Hakkinen decided to go for the win however. And Schumi must have also known that winning the race by this margin is not enough. Anyway, Mika was the faster one there, and one could argue, made a mistake so lost the win. What Schumi did nobody can really confirm
-
So, you love Scumi to nail you from behind xD
-
@mubbarakk Ajd mars u svoju baraku :P
Senna 4 ever!!!!!!!
-
Terga pazi da te neko ne poterga:))
-
@mubbarakk the way you said that...it shows me how really unintelligent u rlly are.......Not even gonna bother.
-
its häkkinen, not hakkinen
Häkkinen is fair, Schumacher not:
Touched Villeneuve, Parking in Monaco...
Senna is the Best RIP
mpapst84 4 years ago 4
I think it is obvious what happened, isn't it? The were fighting wheel to wheel for the victory in the last lap. Any "I-did-not-see-him"-excuses in such a situation are nothing but nonsense. For sure Michael was watching his mirrors at that moment. He lifted off for an instant in order to cause Mika to either hit the brakes or go into the armco. the plan worked. Not really perfect sportsmanship.
TheColinChapman 2 years ago 2