Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Constellation Quarterly Report (June 2009)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,383
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Jul 23, 2009

Constellation Quarterly Report (June 2009)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Water vapor is most of what is left off from the fuel after it burns since it is liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The solid rocket boosters let off the most pollutant, but it doesn't let off enough to cause any harm. Volcanoes that are spewing out all over the Earth all the time cause much more pollution and green house gasses than the shuttle has.

  • Good to see this stuff is getting off the ground and not getting bogged down in all the beauracratic crap that's been surrounding Constellation lately. I really can't wait to see people set foot on the Moon again.

    Keep it up, NASA. I'm proud of you!

see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Somehow, splashing down into water again feels like we are going backward.

  • Maybe they should have wasted the $20 billion on making animations, and produced some rockets (and result). Thanks Griffin..great idea...you screwed the USA

  • No, no, no.

    NASA has been asked many times "What is that flashing light in that video you have? Why is it moving so fast and making turns so fast?"

    Then NASA responds "ammmmmmm, WELL its rubbish! or it could be ice!" xD Or they just dont say nothing!

    Go and do your searches people, dont have time to teach you.

  • Accuracy frequently supposes complexity...

    Not all accurate answers are complex, but I'm usually interested in those that are complex.

    Also, what would make you think that I didn't understand?

  • Really. The USA Military has SIX new hubble space telescopes, otherwise known as Keyhole spy satellites. NASA has to do with the one thats nearly 20 years old.

  • Maybe you just don't understand the answer.

  • at least the computer presentation looks cool

  • Nasa is looking for ways to cut costs while still increasing efficiency, thus splashdown is the best option. Of coarse I would say that it would be better if we just funded nasa more, but the military gets the funding instead. :/

  • Some of the most accurate answers, have to be complex

  • NASA = Never A Straight Answer

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more