Hamza Andreas Tzortzis & Co. (& Embryology in the Qur'an) CANNOT BE DEBUNKED

This video is a response to Klingschor's video
"Hamza Andreas Tzortzis & Co. (& Embryology in the Qur'an) DEBUNKED"
So it is named
" Hamza Andreas Tzortzis & Co. (& Embryology in the Qur'an) CANNOT BE DEBUNKED"
However it is my meager effort to clear some mis-understandings about significance of scientific verses in the Qur'an.

Please visit this website for more knowledge about Embryology in the Qur'an and its comparison to ancient writings.

http://www.quranicstudies.com/articles/medical-miracles/does-the-quran-plagia...

Islambasics.com is my favourite website to gain Islamic knowledge.

Background music is from
DAWUD WHARNSBY ALI
"AFRAID TO READ"

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Tzortzis
• Hamza
• Myers
• DAWUD
• WHARNSBY
• ALI
• AFRAID
• TO
• READ

[farzanatasneem]

@aby1ism

The Prophet was not teaching science as that Hadith was to be for his own time.

The Qur'an is the word of God which we claim possesses the scientific knowledge , not to be taught to humanity but as sign from God

[farzanatasneem]

@aby1ism

Did you watch this video?

Descriptions of embryo in the Qur'an is correct.

The hadiths were not recorded with the time of Prophet's statements and then at the time of recording, it was recorded with the rulings to be derived from them so the Hadith that says 40 days of each states may not have been correctly recorded as about the duration of stages while the stages are correct embryologically

[farzanatasneem]

@aby1ism All verses that do not give clear commands are called Mutashabihaat.

They are not involved with rulings and laws.

[farzanatasneem]

@aby1ism

The Qur'an is from God and does not say anything contradicting scientific developments.

Alaqa has many different meanings and whatever is befitting to the scientific knowledge will be taken for interpretation as it is a Mutashabihaat verse

[aby1ism]

@farzanatasneem

.islam101.com/science/embryo.h­tml

This statement is from Sura 23:14. The word "alaqah" refers to a leech or bloodsucker. This is an appropriate description of the human embryo from days 7-24

Listen to kieth moore.

Which one is correct then? Your islamic scholar or keith moore?

[aby1ism]

@farzanatasneem Again, you havn't actually answered my question. I think you should perhaps read what your scholars say on another embryological inconsistency.

.islam-qa.com/en/ref/37784/40%­20days%20blood%20clot

Why are your scholars getting it so wrong then? Don't they know which verses to take literally or not?

[aby1ism]

@farzanatasneem If these verses are ambiguous then why do we always here of muslims claiming over 50+ miracles from the quran then? How do then know it's not ambiguous? ( not that I actually agree with any of the miracles that I have investigated so far) You can't have it both ways my friend.

[aby1ism]

@farzanatasneem Who decides which verses are ambiguous and which ones are literal? How is a non-believer going to view your religion when no one has an idea which verses are ambiguous and which ones are literal? Do you realise how illogical that sounds? Basically you are saying there is no way to test to see if Islam is true because anything that might contradict science, reality ect is an ambiguous verse.

[aby1ism]

@farzanatasneem What are you talking about? Who says these principles apply to hadiths? Ok I'll accept that they do. The man specifically asked ''i'm going to ask a question that only a prophet would know'' and he got the incorrect answer with regards to science. Why would your prophet be ambiguous in such a matter like this? It doesn't make any sense to qualify this statement as ambiguous.

[farzanatasneem]

@aby1ism

Please watch this video which explains the difference between two types of verses in the Qur'an and their interpretations