N Chomsky 80-20 rule, private tirannies, strategic alliances
Top Comments
All Comments (52)
-
if u get rid of the 80%, pareto law still apllies because the 20% now becomes 100%
-
@Mbowster No, it is more efficient and rewarding to spend your time looking after your 'best' clients. 'Best' meaning clients who are wealthy and can afford to buy way more of your product or service.
-
@ChristophDollis Hence it is amoral for corporations/business to favour the fortunate over the unfortunate. It is a form of punishing the victim.
-
So?
-
@ChristophDollis Many people cannot afford to buy in bulk or in 'economies of scale' through no fault of their own. Donald Trump would be able to though since he inherited millions of dollars from his father...
-
@Mbowster Those nasty Socialist Public Roads, destroying our freedumbs!
Nasty Socialist Fire Department destroying our Freedumbs!
Nasty Socialist Sanitation Department destroying our Freedumbs!
-
Those people who give more in terms of revenue to a company get more service in return?
This is "amoral" to you?
And those who spend less with a business get less service.
You see a problem here?
Asshat.
Seriously.
Internet genius "Mbowster" rocks the world of political philosophy with his famous "Two Categories" theory.
nogirl42 2 years ago 6
if you are limited in your capacity for the service you are selling, then you sell to those that give you the best margin. If you have unlimited capacity to supply the good or service then you sell to even those customers that make you low profit
doesn't take a genius to be honest :P
kaya051285 4 years ago 4