Refuting Tooltime Part One: The Point of Contention
Loading...
Loading...
2,164
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Video Responses
This video is a response to Refuting the Resurrection (Part 1: the Point of Contention)
Loading...
- 9:46
Refuting Tooltime Part Two: The Veracity of the Gospelsby KabaneTheChristian1,777 views
- 10:25
A Reply to the Atheist Experience on St. Matthew's Gospelby KabaneTheChristian23,488 views
- 7:08
RT Part Four: Secular Evidence and the Crucifixionby KabaneTheChristian2,484 views
- 4:45
RT Part 5: The Burial Account and the Empty Tombby KabaneTheChristian1,953 views
- 7:51
We Must Never Compromise Scriptureby scutter4christ226 views
- 6:02
Refuting Tooltime Part Eight: The Alternative Originby KabaneTheChristian1,973 views
- 5:41
Refuting Tooltime Part Three: The Synoptic Problemby KabaneTheChristian5,322 views
- 4:41
Refuting Tooltime Part Seven - Ghost Jesusby KabaneTheChristian1,863 views
- 7:18
Refuting Tooltime Parts Nine Through Twelveby KabaneTheChristian1,746 views
- 0:46
A Quick Questionby KabaneTheChristian2,745 views
- 9:36
Contra Tooltime episode 2by migkillertwo313 views
- 4:04
Chip Tha Ripper - Dear Hip Hop - The Cleveland Showby bcostello125637,207 views
- 6:13
The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemarby emilylemony12,046 views
- 0:33
The *real* manby healthyaddict5,540 views
- 8:16
Is Evolution Compatible with Christianity?by LaneCh65,089 views
- 52:19
A Sermon on Christ for Atheists (Paul Washer w/ Dutch Translator)by LaneCh30,046 views
- 6:56
Only One Less God?by DrOakley16897,838 views
- 12:20
Christopher Hitchens on Being a Servantby DrOakley168910,132 views
- 7:32
William Lane Craig and Christopher Hitchens (HQ)by Christianjr4439,933 views
- 5:27
Joel Osteen, it's just the Truth - Paul Washerby illbehonest263,139 views
I am an Atheist & i find your Vid's very interesting. You steer clear of the Woo & concentrate on the Academic stuff that i like so Thanx. Can't say you've changed my mind but you have made me think!
bismarket 3 months ago
Much of your argument here and elsewhere essentially states that because we accept Tacitus as author, we must accept Gospel authorship. This isn't an argument: this is an assertion of the convenience of the authorship function. If Tacitus didn't write the Annals, fine. Not much really changes. If Matthew didn't write the Gospel, a great deal changes.
And the church fathers are hardly a reliable, objective bunch in this matter. This seems a classic "the bible is true because it says so" moment.
crabbieappleton 1 year ago
The picture of G.W. in the back shows your lack of intelligence
AKaudy 1 year ago
KTC, First off, I'm distracted by that picture of Bush behind you. I'm loosing your monoral oralation. Does that picture give you morning wood when you wake up?
KrazyOyster 1 year ago
A "solid case" for the resurrection of Jesus can be made from...
I'm sorry, I fail to see how a "solid case" can be made from doctrine. Your version of "solid case" and my version are from different planets apparently.
You are trying too hard to validate a shaky source; why? Why is it necessary?
capoman1 1 year ago
Jesus was a mythological creation based on the Egyptian sun god Horus amongst others. So was Moses. The entire things is based on an astrological myth created by pagans and historised by the Romans.
Jammsbro1 1 year ago
Are you just reading from the refutations from popular apologists? Is that a picture of George Bush in the background?
If people put Jesus in the tomb, why is it most likely that God removed Jesus from the tomb rather than the same people that put him in or just "other people"?
politicsthatmatter 1 year ago
KabaneTheChristian - How old are you?
luker4459 2 years ago
(continued)... considering that Tacitus was writing about the reigns of the governors at the time. And if this information was found to be consistent with other reliable data about the leaders he was talking about, then historians can infer that it must have been written by somebody "in the loop" at the time of their reigns (namely a senator). Both of these factors make Tacitus by far the top candidate for authorship of the text. You must demonstrate the gospels have this kind of evidence...
QuantumMaths 2 years ago
You seem to frequently bring up the annals of Tacitus whenever the anonymity accusation is brought up concerning Gospel authors, but I have a slight objection. I do not think historians judge the veracity of Tacitean authorship based on attestation centuries later. The "Annals" contain a writing stile highly unique and characteristic of Tacitus (comparing to his earlier works), and the contents of the work can be rigorously verified... (continued next post)
QuantumMaths 2 years ago