The Shocking Truth About HIV and AIDS

AIDS myths

So the myths about AIDS continue: That a simple blood test can tell you whether you have AIDS, that AIDS is caused by HIV, that HIV is transmitted through blood, that AIDS has no cure, and so on. These are all AIDS myths because they exist in the realm of conventional AIDS dogma that is utterly unwilling to field any questions or stand up to any scientific challenges whatsoever. The mere mention of any intent to question conventional AIDS mythology brands you as an "AIDS denier" -- a vicious, derogatory term thrown about like a linguistic hand grenade in an attempt to instantly halt any intelligent conversation about HIV and AIDS.

You either agree with the conventional AIDS propagandists, or you're a nut, it seems. There is no room for questioning anything. There's no tolerance for those who might think for themselves instead of just swallowing the conventional theories as if they were scientific fact.

But then again, we shouldn't expect anything more than that from conventional medicine, should we? This is an industry steeped in scientific fraud and routine quackery. It is a field of pseudo science that has become extremely proficient at rigging the data in order to fit whatever predetermined outcomes it wishes to support.

The AIDS industry is an outgrowth of this scientific quackery. Fictions about AIDS have given rise to an entire for-profit industry that depends on the continuation of the mythology to keep its cash registers ringing. That's why the attacks against Brent Leung are so vicious: He's the guy who has dared to stand up and say, "The AIDS emperor wears no clothes!"

For daring to point that out, Leung is branded an "AIDS Denier." It's the equivalent of calling him an "Emperor's wardrobe denier" while pretending the emperor is wearing magnificent flowing robes sewn with golden thread.

It all just makes me wonder: What's the point of having a scientific method if the scientists aren't going to follow it?

Category:

Education

Tags:

• HIV
• AIDS
• Luc
• Montagnier
• House
• of
• Numbers
• documentary
• film
• immune
• suppression

[1killogram]

Woah...wtf?!

[PatriotsOath]

Exactly my thoughts...

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@Unknowntyper Look...another anonymous youtube "scientist" who offers ZERO evidence for his claims

see on youtube......re: c0nc0rdance the anonymous youtube "scientist's" refs for What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill

and......C0nc0rdance the anonymous liar and youtube "scientist"

and......re: c0nc0rdance the anonymous youtube "scientist's" refs for What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill

and......C0nc0rdance aka JoeMarkLawson the anonymous youtube "scientist"

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@Unknowntyper You have some nerve going on another video and attacking me Before you've met your original burden of proof here. You don't even bother to read something before "critiquing" it. I've never read any Proust. Want to hear my opinion of his work?

[payooful]

day after day i lose faith in the medical system xD

[HollywoodSheen]

what is this from, a documentary? Which one if so? thnx

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@bluetortilla The "hiv" tests were never scientifically validated. They are unstandardized and nonspecific. They use the answers you give in the survey to "interpret" the results. I have the direct links to the disclaimers on my channel under the profile pic.

Always claim to be a white heterosexual non-ivdu-ing lady if possible. That way even if you get a reaction they'll keep running the tests until they get the "real" result.

On youtube see....HOUSE OF NUMBERS EXCERPT

[bluetortilla]

My job depends on my getting clean HIV tests each time I get a new visa. So what are these people trying to say?

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@Unknowntyper "proof" by consensus isn't a scientific reference no matter what the anonymous youtube "scientist" concordance will have you believe.

You need to prove the VMD true before I have anything to prove wrong. The scientists in my featured video will explain how science works for you.......Why I Quit Hiv with Kary Mullis - Rodney Richards - more HoN

Go ask concordance the anonymous youtube "scientist" for the reference...Title Date and Journal.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@Unknowntyper It mean I have a LACK of belief. It's an analogy.

[Unknowntyper]

The entire medical community at large disagrees with the denialists. Give me a break. The burden of proof is on the denialist claims. You have to prove the current proof wrong. something that has not actually been done. Please block me. I do not care to listen to conspiracy theorist ranting.

[Unknowntyper]

@mykoolaidtastesfunny Sure. Whatever.