4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II)

****Segunda Parte del Episodio II*****

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Shakyamuni
• Buddha
• Buda
• Siddharta
• Gautama
• Gotama
• Mongoloids
• Mongoles
• Kirat
• Shakya
• Koliya
• Vajji
• Malla
• Xiongnu
• Kiranti
• Kirati
• Kiratas
• Yalamber
• Himalaya
• HunaS
• Mahabharata
• India
• Nepal
• Tibet
• Altai
• Altaic
• Altaians
• Turan
• Buddhism
• Religion
• Documentary
• Documental
• Politic
• Política
• Now
• Historia
• Budismo
• Vincent
• A.
• Smith
• Pignede
• Macfarlane
• Harrison
• Antropology
• Aryans
• 2010
• religion
• spirituality
• middle eastern music
• middle east
• politics
• discussion
• news

[WangXiayu]

@Saraswathiputra yes dear friend i am agree with you. !

[Saraswathiputra]

Shakya is Sanskrit origin name which have Gautama lineage.When and where those Mongolians related Aryan Gautama Rishi and from when?

So,you are a Dumb ass!

Simply,the presence of Mongolian race people wont make those ruling class people also Mongoloid.

Get a life!

[diliprai]

@Saraswathiputra Lord Buddha was from Shakya community. Shakya are Mongoloid race.

Define Mongoloid race?

Mongoloid - The maximum people of this race are found in areas of Himalayas like Nepal, Assam, and Burma (Myanmar) . Broad head, average height ,round face, yellow skin, small and flat nose, and small eyes are some common traits of this race.

Still hard to believe. I welcome you to Nepal and visit Shakya town in Kathmandu and see their appearance.

And yes Lord Buddha was born in Nepal.

[Saraswathiputra]

This is fraud.Buddha was born in Vedic Aryan family from the lineage of Vedic Aryan Rishi Gautama.That is why he called Gautama Buddha.It is usually followed as custom in ancient days in India to add before a person his Gotra name which means,the Aryan Rishi through him that particular lineage comes.

Where comes Mongoloid relation and face to him.

Fraud people!

[tadorjee]

This is a misleading video.

Budhism travel from India to Tibet.And Shakyamuni is an Tibetan word.

[Imrankniazi]

@diliprai Would you believe that there is an Afrocentrist on YouTube who is trying to pass off Buddha as a black man? Search for Black Buddha on YouTube and see the insanity with your own eyes :-)

[diliprai]

Listen Sarasathiputra, i know you are Brahmin from India. Why do you still want to deny Mongoloid civilization in the Himalayas. The foothill of the Himalayas region belongs to Mongoloid civilization whom the Aryan refer them as Kirat. No where is the Aryan civilization near the Himalayas foothill during Buddha's time. Still in doubt ask the vice-President of the Council of the World Buddhist University and Mahachulalongkornrajvidalya University in Bangkok, Thailand whom they made this video.

[Saraswathiputra]

diliprai,here is try to fool others by his wishes and guesses which he considers as history.

Nobody is fools here!!

[shreyashb]

@diliprai oh ok bro. u mean that u know more than the real historians, while u, a fake youtube historian, have been trying to prove rais and gurungs and others are different from other nepalese by lying to people. but i dont understand y u hate us so much man.. i just think of everyone as a nepali and go along with it. your arguements makes no sense either. you didnt make it clear who changed khambu, and who was khambu and why would PN Shah sign a treaty to change a name of a place..

[diliprai]

The evidence of the early texts suggests that the Buddha was born in a community [Shakya] that was on the periphery, both geographically and culturally, of the northeastern Indian subcontinent in the 5th century BCE. This community was not yet likely to have been absorbed into Brahmanical culture (the tradition that would evolve into Hinduism), and it is even possible that the Buddha's mother tongue was not Indo-Aryan. (Early Buddhism: A New Approach: The I of the Beholder. Routledge 2000)