Upload

This video is unavailable.

CCTV/TVCC fire in Beijing (HD version) 北京央视大楼着火 - close-up of fire explosion

beorn beorn·2 videos
24

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
199,946
Like     Dislike 9

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like beorn's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike beorn's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add beorn's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 9, 2009

The TVCC building, housing the new Mandarin Oriental hotel, was set ablaze by fireworks from CCTV staff during the Yuanxiao holiday 2009. This was shot from the opposite angle of most shots online, and shows the most powerful explosion during the 6 hour fire.

52-minute footage of TVCC fire in full HD (1920x1080) available for license.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • LifeLibertyNow

    Yeah, those annoying conspiracy theorists who actually think there's something strange about WTC 7 collapsing into its own footprint at free-fall speed, even though the fires in that building were no where near as bad as the fires in the Hotel Mandarin. I mean, seriously, who do they think they are to ask questions based on logic and reason?

    · 17

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LifeLibertyNow's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LifeLibertyNow's comment.
    in reply to AmericanDroid (Show the comment)
  • Moreofthesamez

    NIST: "WTC 7 collapsed due to office furniture fires" - idiot!

    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Moreofthesamez's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Moreofthesamez's comment.
    in reply to lcspies (Show the comment)

Video Responses


All Comments (954)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • jakeyalmighty

    you could fly a plane into my house and it would be taller than the remains of world trade center.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jakeyalmighty's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jakeyalmighty's comment.
    in reply to Andrew Barker (Show the comment)
  • jakeyalmighty

    We're talking about "building 7" which collapsed vertically in on itself despite not getting hit by plane.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jakeyalmighty's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jakeyalmighty's comment.
    in reply to ndewingful (Show the comment)
  • Andrew Barker

    You do realize your little 9/11 conspiracy tin hat has been debunked by the fact that the trade centers were built poorly and were not structurally to code for the era in which they were built?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Andrew Barker's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Andrew Barker's comment.
    in reply to ndewingful (Show the comment)
  • kcazaa

    What the hell does a 747 have to do with anything? A 747 didn't crash into the towers...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kcazaa's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kcazaa's comment.
    in reply to ndewingful (Show the comment)
  • CrownAtGold

    Yeah no thanks! I'll believe a scientifically proven analysis of the incident over your speculative guesstimate.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CrownAtGold's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CrownAtGold's comment.
    in reply to ndewingful (Show the comment)
  • ndewingful

    You idiots realize that a Boeing 747 weighs 24.4 tons and carries 48,732 gallons of fuel right? That alone smashing into the side of a building will bring it down.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ndewingful's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ndewingful's comment.
    in reply to jakeyalmighty (Show the comment)
  • MiaRyanne

    Structural steel is structural steel, and welding is welding. Tell me what qualifies this steel *specifically* to be of higher quality than the WTC? You can't, and you won't...so please stop spreading info that you clearly know nothing about. I live in a family with a person who designs steel high-rise buildings...so please enlighten us to your new technology. What a joke. If anything, builders demand cheaper and lighter materials...not better and stronger.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MiaRyanne's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MiaRyanne's comment.
  • MiaRyanne

    Just curious why sidewalks built 40 years ago last longer than side-walks built today. Sorry, but they built better and higher quality buildings back then...by far. Not even arguable. The WTC tower were brought down, they didn't collapse...it had nothing to do with how they were built. Any building would collapse when men decide to implode it.

    h t t p://w w w .wired DOT com/design/2013/03/poor-qualit­y-chinese-concrete-could-lead-­to-skyscraper-collapses/ . Remove the spaces and change DOT

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MiaRyanne's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MiaRyanne's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later