"The Lost Symbol" - Magic Squares and the Masonic Cipher

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
57,929
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 16, 2009

December 2, 2009

Dan Brown? The Lost Symbol?
Masonic cipher? Albrecht Durers magic square?
If you know about these things AND you can decipher the message below,
then dont bother coming because you know as much as I do.
If you dont know about them OR you cant decipher the message below,
then by all means come and hear my presentation.
Yes, we do have pizza.

Ed Brumgnach

http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/ecet/magicSquares.asp

  • likes, 32 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CUNYQueensborough)

  • can you please post the website with the squares calculations you using in 12:00 on ....... thank you!

  • @ShteinbergArts It won't let me post a direct link to your comment, possibly due to anti-spam purposes, but I've updated the video description with it.

Top Comments

  • @mcamoran That's wrong. The number system was not invented by the arabs. It was taken from India / hinduism by the arabs to the middle east from where it spread to the west.

see all

All Comments (167)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kinda a long winded class, but very informative in practice/application .. Thanks Cuny :)

  • Ed Brumgnach? yeah he went to my highschool

  • nice subject but c'mon does he really need to make that pauses???? spit it out!

  • oh....when u said THE LOST SYMBOL in the vid title i thought it was a LOST the series vid literally went through 50 vids and had no idea wat everyone was talking about LMFAO

  • thanks for the information

  • @Stabacs You're so right. This is folklore. He even draws the "2" wrong and doesn't count all the angles. This is a terrible waste of time.

  • FAIL 17:04

  • easy ...

  • His explanation about the origin of the numbers with those inner angles is just wrong and there is no historical evidence, because they looked very different in ancient india. So they could not count the angles like he did. Oh and has the two, like he wrote it, not 4 inner angles?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more