Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Is the bible god's word(denmark) - 2 of 10

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,549
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2007

is the bible the work of god? Lecture in Denmark 2nd Nov 1991

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • islam is the only way.

  • gagsie2007, U r right, we should see original manuscripts of christendom,which are in hebrew, aramaic and greel language. ok.. and now here comes the shock for your bed rock.

    out of known 24000 most ancient, original, authentic manuscripts, no two are identical. All contradicting each other. Well accept the truth and follow jesus's teaching that ' he will come after me and will guide u into all truth' and thats, Last Prophet, Mohammed.jesus himself said, he was sent only for Jews for that time

  • Who is "they" that threw out chapters and verses? Where is your evidence? It is easy to make statements but you must back them up with proof.

  • is that why they throw out verses, chapters and verses? when it changes once, its changed forever. end of story. see Jermiah 8:8, where the bible says itself that it has been changed.

  • The King James, New Authorised Version, New International Version, Jerusalem, New Jerusalem, etc. are all English TRANSLATIONS based on the languages of the original revelation (they are versions of translations (i.e. difference translations of the original text)). Granted that some version (mainly those used by the Roman Catholic and Anglican traditions) have additional books (Apocrypha) but even these are translations from Hebrew/Aramaic.

  • there versions, not translations. That's 2 different things. 66 books, 73 books, 2 different books.

    QURAN, how many versions of it around the world???

    = 1

  • Just like Muslim, We Christians accept the scriptures in the original language (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek) only. No Christian would ever say that the King James Translation is the infallible word of God (it is a translation). It is therefore unfair when talking about "grave and serious defects" with a TRANSLATION to then use that as "proof" to the defect of the original revelation. You wouldn't do the same with the Quran, so why do it with the bible?

  • May Allah grant you your every wish. A pleasure to listen.

  • "They say" i have heard this mans lectures before and he is filled with hatred and bile

  • Why does only John's Gospel speak of the raising of Lazurus. hmmmm nobody recorded a GREAT miracle of Jesus raising someone from the dead but John. kinda odd?

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more