Uploader Comments (kingscrusher)
Top Comments
-
Fantastic! Excellent play and commentary.
-
Very good video and analysis!
Video Responses
All Comments (37)
-
Great game!
-
I was just kidding by the way. I was trying to be funny by calling you stupid. I think you're awesome and your analyses are a great part of my youtube life.
-
Great game! I thought you were stupid after watching 1 of your games, and then you pull a Bobby Fischer on me. Keep up the good work
-
this may seem like basic opening theory, but i am wanting to adopt this system and was wondering why ...6 e5 isn't met by 7.dxe5 instead of castles
-
HE'S A NOOB BAYONETEER
-
very nice game
-
hi kingscrusher
long time viewer and this is a personal favourite of mine of games you've played. a lot of beautiful moves and very logical.
thanks for all the hard work to entertain and teach us.
-
Thanks for posting this!
-
I'm no expert, but I think it just means that you use your pieces to apply pressure on either dark squares or light squares. White exchanged his dark-squared bishop for KC's knight on f4 early in the game. Since KC still had his dark-squared bishop and white did not, this means that KC will always have one more piece to attack the dark squares than white has to defend them. So I guess it is very logical to 'pursue a dark-square strategy' :) hope that helps.
Please like this video if you got something out of it, or even better add it to your favourites. Help crush the Trolls! You could also subscribe to this channel to get notified of any new videos - subscribing is free and easy.Cheers, K.
kingscrusher 4 months ago