Court Pleadings part 1of 6

This information is my own Political and religious beliefs and or facts, and use, and use, and or receipt of it by anyone constitutes agreement not to sue me or anyone else re: this information. This is not legal advice as I am not an 'attorney' so I could not have knowledge of what legal advice would be. See my other videos that support this under immafreemann. If you go to www.ronintruth.blogspot.com you can send a donation to receive my package that shows how to defend yourself in court and most of my, and others, video's [approximately 30 hours] and also a CDROM with about 450MB's with court cites I use, etc. Peace and Love to all.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• common law
• constitution
• rights
• pleading
• motions
• answer
• complaint
• writ of error
• writ
• court writing
• summons
• credit card debt
• foreclosure
• sovereignty
• defense
• administrative remedy

[slewofdamascus]

I heard someone mention (possibly BT, although I haven't heard it again), in a positive light, something about "California Forms of Pleading and Practice" as a good resource for specific motions or filings etc. I happened to come accross a 45 volume Mathew Bender set with dates that range from '79-'81(no newer supplements are included), in excellent condition, and I'm wondering if the date and lack of updated supplements makes it pointless? The current edition is out of my $ range (smile).

[immafreemann]

@slewofdamascus Matthew Bender- The forms may have been replaced but the Common law pleadings were replaced in 1938 by the Civil Code pleading system. FRCP> Rule 2. One Form of Action

There is one form of action — the civil action. [they joined common law and equity into one action].

THis does not stop you from bringing an action in common law. And the code system of pleading has not changed since 1938 so Discovery, Motions, Subpeona's, Complaints, will be the same, just not presentation

[slewofdamascus]

I have seen many cases where a cite is made from a particular edition of Black's Law, for example, the cite made re: IN PROPRIA PERSONA "4th edition". The implication is that this definition may have or is likely to have changed in later editions. Using BT's example of a "court of record" and how there are 4 elements that establish a COR in previous Black's Law editions where later editions only mention 2, my question is: are the 4 elements still required? Are earlier definitions still viable?

[immafreemann]

@slewofdamascus Are earlier versions still good? Well... are they just definitions? or are they based upon court decisions? In my Blacks 4th revised they quote the court cases that make that definition real. The rule of Stare Decisis, I believe is that law is like building blocks it never changes, it is base upon previous rulings. However, the jury decides the law and the facts, which makes the juror Sovereign [decrees the law]. So written law is more of a social guideline.

[immafreemann]

If you continue to watch all will be revealed. Real Party of Interest = a living soul who can claim a personal injury or deprivation of rights is joined to the plaintiff or is the Plaintiff. Corpus Delecti is "body of the crime" corpus=body, it is the factual evidence of an injury or loss with the intention to commit the injury [not an accident].

[teckniec2]

Great video, thanks man. I'm fighting the state atm for a fraudulent criminal charge. It is nerve recking but I still feel confident because I have the real law on my side. I messed up and made a plea but I motioned to amend because I was acting under duress(was actually arrested,..well kidnapped) but I was smart enough not to "represent myself". Judge was in a hurry at my arraignment so he didn't even try to intimidate me like at my pretrail.

[immafreemann]

@teckniec2 it's never too late to challenge jurisdiction and get paperwork filed. You can always revoke and recind things and 'correct a mistake'

[CJONESVIDBIZ]

Thank You J. Freeman!! Positivity and Abundance.>14k Crow Elite

[Francescaalejandro]

"fleecing of the flock".

[Francescaalejandro]

@Francescaalejandro anyone claiming that fractional reserve is not inflationary is wrong. That is why we have the M3 money supply. When banks are able to expand and contract the volume of money in circulation they control the economy and invest accordingly. I have learn that when banks make credit easy they are getting ready to crash the economy. They do so but they are prepared to take advantage. They wait to see what falls from the tree. In the late 19th century this was called

[Francescaalejandro]

This is an excellent series because this is where we "little people" could fight the bankers. The bankers using the fractional reserve scheme loan you nothing of value. They pretend that the money is taken from depositors but in fact the deposits and the loan exist independently. Thus a bank creates money out of thin air to loan. In a foreclosure or bankruptcy the bank is trading a promissory note for a real asset.

[slewofdamascus]

Thanks, man. Much appreciated.