DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 02
Top Comments
All Comments (79)
-
When will this man stop speaking false facts.
-
@Darkaero199 your own science does. lolllllll
-
@hagenttzd emotions are there for a reason.
-
@Darkaero199 You sir, are the rambling moron. The universe is fine tuned indeed. Modern science agrees with this....no one says that means there is only life on earth. Sorry if it bores you but that doesn't change the perception of the universe by modern science. Moreover, you seem to be the one who cannot think outside the box...not Craig. If you had listened to this video with an open mind Craig's logic is very clear. Just wanted to share that. =]
-
Funnier and funnier as the video goes on.
-
@chaosrokkfreak WLC the master of assertion!! If the universe was different, it would be different. We only have one universe as a sample, therefore you cannot assume these constants are even capable of being different.
-
@504235 b/c hitches is a fame whore and loves hearing his own voice.
-
@504235 I'm inclined to believe the first option. He his basically saying that the universe is complex and therefore theists have better reasons for saying there is a god than athesists saying there is none. That is a contradiction which has been pointed out to him several times, still... he just ignores it at continues like nothing happened.
-
Those of you that question William Lane Craig's intelligence and philosophical "chops" puzzle me. If Dr. Craig was some idiot with no real argument why is Christopher Hitchens debating him? Only two option exist. One he is an egotistical maniac who only cares about making himself look the genius by tearing others down. Two he believes he will has a worthy adversary in Dr. Craig. I am inclined to believe the latter.
-
Insults and false accusations do not discredit an awesome philosopher! His case is legitimate, and his arguments sound!
Craigs argument is not so much cosmological as it is emotional. appeal to emotion=logical fallacy. As a "philosopher" he should know better.
hagenttzd 11 months ago 15
He shouldn't be labeled a philosopher at all. His train of thought is leading to one idea, he literally can't think outside of the box. His argument that there was "nothing" before the big bang is obviously flawed, as are his ideas about other universes, the fine tune argument is so boring, who says this universe is fine tuned? And who says it's fined tuned for one species on one planet in one solar system in one galaxy etc.... hes a rambling moron.
Darkaero199 11 months ago 6