Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtnJVm2oKFo
Explanation for the 2.25 seconds of free fall:
http://ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php?page=Freefall+Speed
Explanation for why WTC7 didn't completely tip over:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20...
Chief Daniel Nigro's quote:
http://911guide.googlepages.com/danielnigro
Other firefighter quotes on building 7:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/accountsofwtc7damage
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
Video of firefighter worrying about building 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HLDgjYuRHk
Larry Silverstein and "pull it":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLLin6i_Xrw
The Jane Standley incident is explained here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1T0PqzkFxso
NIST report on WTC7:
http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf
NIST on Thermite:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html
Steven Jones and Thermite:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/stevene.jones%27thermitethermateclaims
http://ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php?page=Steven+Jones
http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm#Iron Spheres
http://ldspatriot.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/911-steven-jones-and-me/
http://www.911myths.com/html/traces_of_thermate_at_the_wtc.html
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
Apparantly, Steven Jones now believes that thermite was just a fuse for other types of explosives:
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2009/05/response-to-harrit-jones-etal-fr...
Richard Gage admits that controlled demolitions are outside of AE911Truth's expertise, and some other doozies from AE911Truth:
http://ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php?page=Top+10+Boneheaded+Mistakes
The best analysis of the Barry Jennings account so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRfctTxaIZY
How Barry felt about being taken out of context:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyKtNHPeKxg
The "countdown" explained:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lhwCM_dicc
The BBC's documentary on building 7:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9072062020229593250&ei=c5ERSvCuMo...
The audio and most of the video in this part is live. The next part has more of a mixture of live and previously shot footage, but most of the audio on that part is live. I was thinking about putting the clips of the previously shot footage in the order that they happened, but I'm not sure when everything was shot, so I put everything in the order that they aired instead. Part 3 has extra footage that I didn't want to include in the chronology, because it would have messed up the flow of the live clips in part 1 that cover the damage to wtc7.
Please note that I don't have all the news coverage from 9/11, just what's available on archive.org, plus a few clips from various sources. There was also more coverage on wtc7 from the archive.org footage, but I didn't include everything, because it would have become way too repetitive. For example, there were times when the anchors simply reminded the television audience that wtc7 had collapsed, but they didn't add anything new or of importance. There was also more footage showing building seven while it was burning, but I included all the closest shots.
Specific stations:
ABC 7, BBC, CBS 9, CNN, FOX 5, NBC 4
you should look up this video -- WTC7 -- This is an Orange
091101insidejob 2 years ago
That video shoots itself in the foot. It's trying to convince us that WTC7 was a controlled demolition by comparing it to controlled demolitions that don't look or sound the same.
911FullContext 2 years ago
you seen the DVD by AE911 truth? they got high zoom video of the thing, all done very nicely, it shows much my friend. I would jsut wish you would consider it
LLCoolPass 2 years ago
I saw that infomercial. I think it's all been debunked already. I know most of it has, at least. Some of those debunkings can be found in the description of this video. I liked his box show, though. :)
911FullContext 2 years ago