Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Italian debate show-WTC7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,922
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 2, 2006

This is a segment from an Italian debating show called "Matrix". The clip precedes a discussion about the collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7; Note the comparison between WTC7 and a controlled demolition...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Chewbacca2000)

  • Thank You! I've been looking for an implosion of a steel frame buildings to compare to wtc7. The web here has been scrubbed. Only unreinforced masonry buildings. I would like to add this to my wtc7 video

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=A-c-6qkbxd0

  • You can d/l it here;

    http://www.911podcasts.com/dis­play.php?cat=9997&med=0&ord=Na­me&strt=30&vid=113&epi=0&typ=0

Top Comments

  • That is a demolition! How could anyone think that that building would have collapsed due to debris hitting it!?

  • The closest we have to an official story of WTC7 is the NIST report. Google WTC7 + NIST and look on page 26. Note that the east end and west end of the main roof collapsed within a HALF SECOND or each other.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Another reason for lack of sound besides for the obvious ones I stated 2 posts down could be masking agents. Why wouldn't some sort of material or materials be used to soften the explosive sound if it was black operation? To repeat, according to Fire - Science 101, sound is NOT a prerequisite to test for explosives. Explosives should've been tested for, to put the issue at rest.

  • @ leftysergeant Actually steel structures if left to burn, burn out and leave the structural skeleton still standing. Every example that I've seen shows that the combustibles burn out and the fire moves on to another part of the building. The complete building NEVER collapses.

  • @leftysergeant Actually, according to the firman's protocol, there doesn't have to be sound in order to test for explosives or accelerants. No testing for explosives was ever done. Where the explosives were placed amongst all the other noise, quality of the recording devices, relationship of position of where recording device was with the explosion of WTC7, and other reasons could explain for lack of sound. Recorded sound is NOT mandatory.

  • @charlesfloyb If you knew anything about CD, you would llbe saying "WTF? Where are the ear-splitting explosions that every recording device in Manhattan would have heard?"

    Fire Science 101- Steel structures collapse if left to burn.

  • @80smusicfanNO1 steel buildings frequently collapse due to fire. The WTC buildings that collapsed were just the largest steel buiildings ever to catch fire after sustaining structural damage from impacts.

  • @leftysergeant Obviously you know nothing about firefighting. If you did, you'd recognize this as controlled demolition.

  • A colleague of mine expressed it exhaustively, referring to WTC 7:

    "A building comes down like that. Of course it is a controlled demolition. How stupid can people be?" (my translation from Finnish)

    See also on YouTube:

    9/11 1WTC North Tower vs. Controlled Demolition

  • "When the arugment is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates.

    Your out of hand unsubstantiated dismissal "sucks". Betcha dollars to donuts you didn't even read past the first page at any of the sites.

    911myths dot com

  • There is no building 7, it was a giant toaster.

    LOL j/k I was bored.

  • PkofPk your sources suck...

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more