Top Comments
All Comments (419)
-
@daddyfatsaxohten holy shit, four whole comments
tl;dr he mad
-
I get the same feeling. Whenever I hear yuck, I immediately want to listen to dinosaur jr.
-
Did you originate as a Youtube Poop maker or something?
Good review, either way.
-
This album is great in my opinion. No clue what your smoking. Lol.
-
Why did bash Cage the Elephant for "being unoriginal" and then go and "praise influence"
-
*on full throttle, I mean
-
And here's the kicker! Your definition of 'experimental' is totally fucking devoid of melody in a lot of cases, nor any kind of power a lot of the time. But fuck it, I'll keep watching for the discussion but know this, people watching: if you're a fan of Yo La Tengo or Pavement you will love the hell out of this thing. Strong 8 as far as I'm concerned, since despite it's flaws it does continue to entertain even 8 months after you first heard it
-
the production is excellent as well - I really can't comprehend why you wouldn't enjoy this album unless you had your douchevision or full throttle. Same issue with that Girls record, though I'll admit its praise was far less deserving than what this thing got. This blinder, I guess you could call it, that you have basically has one outcome, and always has done: we get recommended 'experimental' music by your standards rather than solid alternative rock, and that kinda sucks
-
you know, as much as I love your reviews, the recurring theme of "originality' - or your perfection of it - is so ignorant sometimes it's baffling. Good music is good music, no matter where the inspiration came from... in this case Pitchfork, and pretty much everywhere else had it right, this is a really enjoyable album, and the primary reason for that is that it IS a throwback to the 90s. What separates it from the crowd of 'revivalists' though is it's heart: it seems sincere
AND I'M GONNA SHAVE MY MUSTACHE!
grayfox622 11 months ago 20
I found this review extremely unhelpful.
LeoKendrickson 8 months ago 9