Bobby Jindal response to Barack Obama

Bobby Jindal speaks to the people of the USA as if they are children and continues his misleading spin and outright lies about his accomplishments and goals. In the video I discuss several issues that many in the national media have not touched on yet. So here are some links to provide some backup information. Some are links to my blog, but those links include further references.

Jindal opposes stimulus funding to expand unemployment: http://blog.lj4a.com/2009/02/23/liar-liar-pants-on-fire/ and http://blog.lj4a.com/2009/02/20/jindal-rejects-additional-unemployment-stimul...

Jindal left most earmarks intact: http://www.wwltv.com/topstories/stories/wwl071608tpearmarks.6090dea9.html

Jindal misleads on his support for the Louisiana income tax cuts: http://bestofneworleans.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A51254

Jindal on Healthcare: http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/25/bobby-jindals-healthcare-scam/ and http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/12/03/louisiana-dead-last-in-healthcare-jindal-come... and http://www.jindalisbad.com/fraud-and-abuse-revisiting-jindal%E2%80%99s-health...

Obama's healthcare plan: http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/09/20/256/

Jindal feels that teaching ID can be part of teaching the "best science": http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/06/15/bobby-jindal-on-face-the-nation/

Jindal supports vouchers in a pilot program: http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/04/03/jindal-wrong-on-education/

Jindal on ethics and transparency: (This is a long list folks)

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/07/09/jindals-office-the-most-opaque-in-the-nation/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/07/11/jindal-nixes-ethics-bill/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/05/29/jindal-deadbeat-dad-of-ethics-reform/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/04/23/more-on-jindal-and-ethics/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/03/31/if-theyre-not-touching-the-dough-the-ethics-g...

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/02/12/jindal-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/02/07/solving-the-perception-of-corruption/

http://blog.lj4a.com/2007/11/29/elliott-stonecipher-on-bobby-jindals-ethics-r...

And most importantly, an explanation why the ethics ranking used by Jindal is flawed: http://blog.lj4a.com/2008/12/29/on-bobby-jindals-first-year-in-office/

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Bobby
• Jindal
• Barack
• Obama

[indiajesuslovesyou]

Bobby has the capacity to be President of the United States! Even in 2012! Thankyou. James Sasse.

[lj4adotcomdan]

@indiajesuslovesyou On what grounds? His ethics "reform" has been proven to be merely window dressing. He spends half his time on the campaign trail raising money. His idea of reforming healthcare is just to cut without looking at the impacts of his cuts. There is no way he should ever be considered for President.

[lj4adotcomdan]

@indiajesuslovesyou Capacity? He meets the constitutional requirements,. But I find it sad that you would make such a claim without explaining why. That is what is wrong with politics today. Blind devotion to candidates is scary.

[dijama3]

Very interesting and informative. All the republicans who suggested Bobby respond to the President were kicking themselves in the ass about 10 seconds into Bobby's speech. What a joke and anyone who can say anything positive about Bobby or Palin are just plain ignorant or republicans (probably both).

[lj4adotcomdan]

Thanks!

[thedaddydrummer]

You all want to talk about the way he speaks but you don't see Jindal saying 'uhhhhhhh' or 'aaaaannnndddd' every other word like Hussein Osama, master of the teleprompter. I admit, it was a little gay but he'd be better than the jackass in office right now.

[lj4adotcomdan]

He spoke down to the american public, not something someone who seeks higher office does.

More important to how he said it, was WHAT he said. And probably even more important that is what he has done.

[lj4adotcomdan]

I hope it is not at my horrible singing! :)

[theoriginalsafinette]

i have never laughed so hard in my life! thank you, this is great.

[lj4adotcomdan]

I am not in the man's head, so I cannot claim to speak for him and say what his reasons are. Though, when someone signs legislation that removes his/her office from the public records law, that seems to tell me that the person is going to do something he/she doesn't want to public to know about. This, of course, is only an assumption but I find it to be a reasonable one, don't you? Can you come up with an alternative reason?

And the "birth" thing was meant to be a bit of a joke... sarcasm.