The NASB is a Satanic Bible, it's own cross references in Isa. 14:12 proves it.

This is a video made in response to 'defense against evil's' video on the NIV showing that it was a Satanic bible. This video shows that the NASB, as well as the NIV,are Satanic Bibles. They both use 'morning star' instead of 'Lucifer' in Isa.14:12 and then link 'morning star' to Rev. 22:16, which is a clear reference to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Their own cross references condemn them and those that defend them.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• King James Bible
• New Age Bibles
• Lucifer
• Satan
• Morning Star

[HiDefJesus]

I'm not sure how this is a Satanic controversy. Who exactly is this deceiving? Can you name one prominent minister or theologian that actually uses these verses within the NASB to support the idea that Jesus and Satan are the same person?

[edwardpf123]

@HiDefJesus - Clearly it deceived the editors of the Ryrie NASB Study Bible, who cross referenced from Isa.14:12 to 2Pe.1:19, Rev.2:28, 22:16, all verses which refer to Christ.

The footnote states that Isa.14:12 'evidently a reference to Satan and because of the inappropriatness of the expressions of Isa.14:13-14 on the lips of any but Satan' but not inappropriate enough not to use a cross reference to those verses that do refer to Christ.

This a Bible controversy, not a Satanic one.

[HiDefJesus]

"Morning star" is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan in Scripture. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as a lion. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is referred to as a lion. The point is both Jesus and Satan have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways. The same can be applied to the term "morning star".

[edwardpf123]

@HiDefJesus -the passage in Isa.14:12 talks about Lucifer, the one who fell. The point is that Satan is always trying to imitate Christ and steal His titles. The NASB editors helped him do so.

[edwardpf123]

@StevieWonder501 -Salvation can't be both an event and a process. There must be different kinds of salvation other then eternal and that is what Phil. is speaking about.

It is talking about working your faith for growth.

Enduring to the end has nothing to do with eternal salvation, it refers to entering the Millennium kingdom

The language is Biblical English, translated from the original tongues, I am not communicating from the original tongues.

[StevieWonder501]

@edwardpf123 "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling." Salvation is certainly an event, yet it is also a process - whoever endures to the end will be saved, Jesus said. The Holy Spirit seals us for redemption, and God works in us to work out our salvation (Phil. 1:6, 2:13).

I have a question - if the KJV is the *only* Bible that is holy, why don't you write in it's language (the thees and thous, etc)?

[thelordsfieldhand]

Amen!!! Call out those phonies!!! Who in their right mind would want a fake bible?

[edwardpf123]

@StevieWonder501 -Thank you, I will believe the truth. All the modern versions contain a false gospel in them. See 1Cor.1:18 where they have salvation as a process not an event (saved), which was the translation of all the pre-1611 Bibles.

I preach the Christ revealed by the scriptures (1Cor.15:3-5), which in English is the KJB.

[StevieWonder501]

@edwardpf123 Believe what you want to, but don't stop preaching Christ. Don't preach the KJV (which I'm sure you don't) - preach the living Christ. Grace and Love

[edwardpf123]

@StevieWonder501 -The language of the KJB isn't 'archaic' it is the original tongues put into English-it is Biblical English, not archaic English.