Uploaded by TheAtheistPaladin on Sep 27, 2007
Reasons why I have changed from weak atheism to strong atheism.
Category:
Tags:
- Atheim
- Atheist
- Paladin
- god
- religion
- TheAtheistPaladin
- ignosticism
- theological
- noncognitivism
- strong
- atheism
- weak
License:
Standard YouTube License
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (TheAtheistPaladin)
Top Comments
-
I am his friend, asshole. Where are yours?
GypsyWytch 4 years ago 4
-
Something that is aphysical and atemporal is indistinguishable from what we would otherwise call "nothing".
"theological noncognitivism"
Welcome to strong atheism!
mwilliams0 4 years ago 3
Video Responses
All Comments (37)
-
Exactly! But how can you say it doesn't exist when nothing has has been put forth. It's not even a concept it's just a word without meaning in many instances.
OpenAirAtheist 7 months ago
-
The simple reason why "God" is meaningless is because nobody labeling themselves "theist" can give you any reason to believe that they themselves can imagine anything which they would label "God". Thus all they have is the sound "God", or the row of three alphabet letters beginning with a capital "G", with an "o" in the middle, and a "d"' on the right end. "God" is simply like "Fod" in that it has no existent or imaginary referent.
EdwinMcCravy1 8 months ago
-
Also, regarding gravity, you're right, it's not really a tangible thing. It's a result of a tangible thing, a material thing.
You must have material to have gravity.
Therefor, consciousness (i.e. a god) cannot have consciousness without material. You need a brain to have consciousness.
TheJacolyte 3 years ago
-
It is impossible for a god to exist, just like it is impossible for squares to be circle.
A god has all the criteria for non-existence. You cannot smell, taste, touch, see, feel, detect with infrared, nightvision, radio frequency, etc. Nothing you can ever do will detect a force known as a god, ever, that's what a god is by definition.
You're essentially saying "Non-existence... exists"
It's as logical as saying "that is a square circle"
It's mutual contradiction.
A god is impossible.
TheJacolyte 3 years ago
-
Yet both gravity and light can defined and observed. But with god you can only give secondary(god is father, god is creator), negative(god is supernatural, god is spirit), and contradictory (god is all-powerful and all-knowing). Yet god is not observe and not defined in a reasonable manor. Yet I should still be open to the concept that contradicts it-self? and vague?
TheAtheistPaladin 3 years ago
-
to calculate it's effects and consequences, but there isn't any definition of what gravity really is. No one can point and say "there's gravity. This is what it looks like and what it's made of." It holds the universe together and is a law that much of science hangs on, but there's no definition of what it is.
The same is true of light. Sometimes it's defined as particles, sometimes waves. No one really understands what light is, but we'd laugh at someone, who claimed not to believe in light.
0StarGirl5000 3 years ago
-
I would give the traditional definition of God. Omniscient, omnipotent, all benevolent ect.
Granted such a concept is, or nearly is beyond human comprehension and may seem to be impossible or contradictory and it certainly can't be made into a math formula, but that doesn't disprove God's existence.
People can believe in things they can't define or understand and in fact they do so on a regular biases. Take gravity for example, scientist know it exists and can use mathematics-c-
0StarGirl5000 3 years ago
3:34
Why is Religion So Important to Atheists?by TheAtheistPaladin13,879 views
6:49
Theological Noncognitivism - Re: Re: Why Atheism?by XOmniverse1,419 views
3:29
Cart Before The Horse: The Incoherency of the God Conceptby ScepticalAgnostic292 views
9:38
Re: In Defense of Strong Atheismby ballyboneman397 views
13:50
GREAT ATHEISTIC QUOTESby URBANRUST506,973 views
9:38
What is God?by ProfMTH26,574 views
7:54
Who wants atheist for friends?by jezuzfreek77768,456 views
2:41
Atheism, Weak and Strongby Syrocast284 views
10:50
The Atheist Experience #618 Strong Atheists and a few definitionsby TurboDally1,535 views
2:29
Atheists are wrong - lets kill them!!!by Theologikos429,431 views
8:14
Why Religion Saddens Meby VanCoffeeChick32,144 views
10:42
When will Jesus come back?by TheAtheistPaladin2,030 views
5:31
A strong Atheist and a Piece of Chalkby dlockcarr30,627 views
2:51
Proof Atheism is the fastest growing Doctrineby VoteSATANforGOD4,362 views
7:50
Agnostics, do the math!by logossfera506 views
1:38
Reasons to become a atheistby Dalbert3422,698 views
8:22
Biblical litteralist were correct.by TheAtheistPaladin481 views
6:37
Weak and strong atheism - The Atheist Experience #635by TheAtheistExperience6,680 views
4:19
Re: I Am an Atheist? - A response to Jackby wassholm252 views
3:37
Are YOU a Weak or a Strong Atheist?by pixelatedxdeath369 views
- Loading more suggestions...
-C could exist, doesn't mean He's impossible. Unlike God, men aren't omniscient. It's possible that there are things beyond our comprehensive ability, therefore it's possible that God could exist.
0StarGirl5000 3 years ago
You first have to make definition of god that reveals proper ontology of that deity. You can not say that "it" exists until you define what "it" is first. Unless you can prove that in our daily lives we believe in something before we can define or understand what it is first.
TheAtheistPaladin 3 years ago
Personally, I find strong atheism very arrogant. Take a look at your argument.
+I can not understand/conceive of the concept of God.
+Anything that's impossible for me to understand must not be possible.
----
=Therefore God is not possible
Understanding has limits. Babies can not understand higher mathematics. Dogs could not conceive of the idea of color. But that doesn't mean the truths of calculous are impossible, or that color can't exist.
Just because you don't understand how God -C
0StarGirl5000 3 years ago
Actually I find your argument hypocritical. You do the same thing all the time. You reject the existence of anything that has contradictory traits. Such as square-circles. In truth, If you do not understand what you believe in then you do not believe in it PER SE but believing in belief it-self and not the actual concept.
TheAtheistPaladin 3 years ago