William Dembski Mathematician explain intelligent design!
Loading...
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (1,065)
-
Wow, only 2 seconds before a lie. New creatard vidio record.
ID is not science.
-
What a failure.
-
Utter nonsense. How do you find "traces of design" when it's your theory that everything is designed? It's not like an archaeologist finding an arrowhead. An arrow can be differentiated from the surrounding material. The traces are intelligent HUMAN design can be seen in an arrowhead because it's different from the rock.
But if you assume it's all designed how to pick out the arrowhead?
It's only an assumption that rock was designed, nothing more.
-
@lightsoutnow30 Why are all creationists experts on what it takes to be science. You have never opened a science book in your life. You don't need to create a universe a lab to study it.
Go dig your own fossils in a controled inviroment.
-
@gregrutz Wow, if that is your argument, then scientist have a real problem in proving their many theories that can not be reproduced in a control environment.
-
@gregrutz Wow, if that is your argument, then scientist have a real problem in proving their many theories that can not be reproduced in a control environment.
-
@lightsoutnow30 It was a judge the creationists liked. LOL
People showed a text book with 'ID' replacing 'Creation Science' in the identical sentence.
ID is an argument for God, it is not science and can never be proven.
-
@PaulinaPaulino Yes, when one can not change a person's mind kindly resort to some form of unflattering and just plain angry words that border on violent tendencies. You need help. If you did not understand my point, thats ok. I am not trying to change your mind, and I dont want to.Because what you believe is what you believe, Wow, that sounds like a form of religion.
5:05
God's Quality Control 3.13by GreatBigBore7,954 views- 2:15
Intelligent Design: Who Designed the Designer?by DiscoveryInstitute12,376 views
- 1:48
Bacterial Flagellum - Evolution's Nightmare & Demiseby jameskguy174,445 views
- 1:40
Students Protest Evolutionby tawawnaB5,953 views
- 3:25
Famous Atheistsby Mrn3r033,332 views
- 15:00
Hitchens Dembski Debate Nov 2010 1 of 10 www keepvid comby saaitar24,815 views
- 2:03
Does archaeology confirm or contradick the Bible?by nicoforjesus1,626 views
- 17:43
William Dembski: How To Be An Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (or not) Part 2by SEvangelicalSeminary1,987 views
- 7:26
William Dembski on The Jon Stewart Showby IDquest10,248 views
- 5:22
God's Quality Control 2.0by GreatBigBore21,307 views
- 1:18
Detecting design? Most persuasive argument ever.by nicoforjesus1,062 views
- 2:00
David Theodore how can anyone know God Exits?by nicoforjesus4,123 views
- 4:11
Sample clip "Icons of Evolution:Curriculum Models"by AccessResearch3,958 views
- 1:05
Michael Behe on Intelligent Designby Ruminator32,459 views
- 5:03
Sample clip "The Privileged Planet" V048by AccessResearch3,839 views
- 5:14
Sample clip "Evening with Phillip Johnson and Friends" V040by AccessResearch2,842 views
- 8:08
Questioning evolution theory THIS IS INCREDIBLEby SerpentSlayer1167,119 views
- 1:16
The End of Christianity - by William A. Dembskiby DPMosteller1,481 views
- 1:33
can i trust the bible?Gary Habernasby nicoforjesus1,119 views
- 1:16
William Dembski Mathematician is intelligent design......by nicoforjesus2,368 views
ID is not controversial because it challenges the theory evolution.
ID is controversial because it was PROVED in a court of LAW to be nothing more than creationism repackaged.
read: "Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District"
What William Dembski has done is this video is lie to people when he says (at 1:00 ) it is not, and lying to make your case, besides being un-scientific, is decidedly un-Christian as well.
PaulinaPaulino 11 months ago 12
@lightsoutnow30 I have no intention to change your mind, as you will not look objectively at evidence. I understand your point 100%. You, like most theists, are trying to rationalize your fairy tale by downplaying everything that is contrary to your belief system.
I do not need any help, I do not have any beliefs- I do not need them. I have evidence, and I have science, and you have neither. That is why my position is based on facts and yours is based on fantasy.
PaulinaPaulino 6 months ago 3