Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

MSS - 10 July - Part 5 - more bigotry and homophobia

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,141
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 10, 2011

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • To answer Patrick Ffrench, the deal with calling a gay partnership a marriage is about the principle. Its like saying that the gays aren't worthy of marriage.

  • Honestly, I think the thing he missed out on was blatantly obvious from how confused he was on the marriage certificate part. He implied all marriages took place in churches, and thus directly forgot about the non-religious couples who get married purely in court or at a district office.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • keep bringing on c0ncordance please

  • The anser to Pat should have been with religion and why? Religions are basically unfounded ideas that are pulled out of their, or some other person's ass. Imo, government should stay out of relationships. There should be a VIP list for who a person authorizes to visit them in an E.R. and emphasis on properly denoting inheritances through wills. Other than that, polygamy, polyandry, hetero, homo, or whatever relationships is no other's fucking business.

  • If your not defending your own views here Conc0rdance.. why dont you shut the fuck up.. Good lad.

  • Marriage is much older than the Judeo-Christian religion. Societies all over the world had it and it wasn't always religious.

  • OK, so let's not call it marriage.

    Let's call it matrimony.

  • Patrick Ffrench is basically saying we should deny some people the use of the word marriage to make religious people happy. They will then go around and say it is not a true marriage and treat is with disrespect. It sounds like discrimination to me.

  • @warriorchristian1994 I totally see that point, but I say let them have marriage, remove it of it's value, the state shouldn't have anything to do with that religious institution anyway. I'd rather have a Civil Union, fuck the institution of marriage, it's just like a baptism or a bris. Marriage is the lesser position.

  • I actually agree with Patrick. The only problem they have is with calling it marriage, if it's just a word game who the shit cares?

  • SCHMARRIAGE! 

  • I wish c0nc0rdance would run for office. This show kicks so much ass.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more