T.R.U.T.H. about the Dinosaurs: Soft Tissue

Click this link to watch a video about the people involved in this blood cell discovery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97jYngUaepA

Check out this link for more information about this topic.
http://www.icr.org/article/2032/

[This clip is an excerpt from the DVD project "T.R.U.T.H. about the Dinosaurs", which can be found on-line at www.theTRUTHgroup.com or at www.livingwaters.com.]

Category:

Education

Tags:

• TRUTH
• Group
• Daniel
• Paul
• Leonardo
• hadrosaur
• T-Rex
• red
• blood
• cells
• soft
• tissue
• Creation
• evolution
• dinosaur
• dragon
• behemoth

[thinkingman07]

@gregrutz You apparently believe anything that and evolutionist tells you. If you studied anatomy you would find a pig's tooth is vastly different than a human. Additionally this story was believed because evolutionists like yourself are so credulous to anything that seems to support your theory that you will except fraud as proof. Nebraska man was submitted as evidence along with Piltdown man in the scopes trial as PROOF of evolution. Fraud not Proof!

[gregrutz]

@thinkingman07 Mary says the fossil is still 70 million years old, nice try.

[gregrutz]

@thinkingman07 You don't even know what a fossil is, creatard. Piltdown man was the only fraud, exposed by scientists. Nebraska man was a pigs tooth. Pigs have the same teeth we do. It was miss identifed, not a fraud. Do you believe all the crap your pastor tell you?

Evolution was proven 150 years ago, get over it.

[thinkingman07]

@gregrutz That is an outright lie. You forget the piltdown man and the nebraska man just to say a few. Vestigial organs are my other favorite evolutionary error. There are none, but at one time the had 180 of them one of which was the pituitary gland. Error after error after error is the history of evolution. Followed by zealots like yourself who say that there were none. At least be honest.

[thinkingman07]

@gregrutz Insults won't hide your semantic game. Bones can be fossils. Nevertheless, I am glad you mentioned that a fossil is a former organic structure replaced by inorganic material. This is the problem if this were so with a 70 million yo bone then the connective tissue of hemeoglobin an organic structure would not be visible under a microscope no matter what acid you put it in.

[gregrutz]

@thinkingman07 When a bone get fossilized most of the bone is replaced with rock minerals. It this case they soaked the rock in strong acid for week to desolve away the rock leaveing the ''soft tissue'' and ''what looked like red blood cells'' They only found breakdown products in the 70 million year old fossil. Do you believe what every preacher says about science? Even when they have no idea what science is?

[thinkingman07]

@puncheex Unless you are reading a work by Paul Offit, you would know that indeed cancer is linked to the SV40 and not all the lots of the Polio Vaccine had it. Moreover, scientist have shown where the lots of the polio vaccine which contained the SV40 virus rates of cancer have increased. In addition scientist have also discovered in histological samples the virus in oncocells. Look up the journal oncogene 2003 and SV40 they did a good job of laying out the evidence.

[thinkingman07]

@gregrutz What is the difference between a bone and fossil. Can a bone be a fossil at the same time? Knock of the pretense with semantics. You will believe anything as long as the verb "evolve" is placed in the sentence some where. 

[gregrutz]

@sonwisdom There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.

There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!

It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of biologists.