Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Global Warming Science - Part 2- Greenhouse Effect

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,828
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 24, 2007

Covers the basic science behind Global Warming. This is second of a series that sets up a foundation for critically understanding global warming. This lecture covers the Greenhouse Effect.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jas2754)

  • Another experiment..with heat transfer.

    The Global Warming theory only uses Radiation in the model. There are two other methods called Conduction and Convection. Conduction is not all that important but Convection is very important.

    Convection transfers energy to other air molecules by WIND, and allows the heat energy to be re-radiated into space.

    The last time I checked, the Earth has WIND.

    Maybe the Computer Climate Models should also use CONVECTION?

  • I agree, Convection is important from a modeling perspective , and there are lots of other factors... greenhouse effect is just one of them. I would hope these climate models account for convection.

  • Ok, now do an actual measurement with the real glass covered greenhouse. Take a temperature measurement of the atmosphere in the greenhouse. Now double the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse and take another temperature measuement.

    Result...NO temperature rise!

    TRY IT!!

  • I am not surprised I would be surprised if it did increase.. the absorption of IR occurs over the entire atmosphere, lets say approximately 10,000 feet of it( the thickness of most of the atmosphere). A house with double the concentration of CO2 won't absorb much more. There is another point, a greenhouse with glass dominates the effect .. the CO2 effect is much smaller.

    Now was the greehouse temperature warmer than the air outside?

Video Responses

This video is a response to Global Warming Science - Part 1
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is utter tripe. There is no Scientific proof of this Theory. Co2 is a harmless gas which is a product of a warming Planet caused by the past Grand Solar Maximum. A tiny amount of trace gas in the Atmosphere cannot drive the climate.

  • @mphello "unpatriotic".... yes that's right & I'm proud to be unpatriotic because things like patriotism & faith are just forms of blind unthinking subissive obedience. Like I said, you really need to wake the fuck up. You're the one who is wishing for a prison-plannet where everyone has to pay carbon taxes to a bunch of evil depopulationists who want to murder & rape everybody. You are practicly bending over with your pants down begging for it. You have so irretrievably lost this argument. Bye.

  • @Galv140577

    Unpatriotic shit like you deserve to be tried, convicted, and sent to PRISON for life where you'd LOVE the overcrowding, and where you deserve to be RAPED every day for life, just like you'd enjoy.

    The Unabomber was a patriotic soldier-hero who should have mailed bombs to YOU. There is ZERO proof that that would have ANY net negative effect on the world.

  • @mphello Oh what a surprise... a climate-stability-denying-man-­made-global-warming-alarmism-p­ropagandist saying things like "overpopulation deniers" lol. So there you have it. You admit you are a depopulationist, as well a climate-stabiliy denier. Thanx for proving my point that there is a depopulation agenda behind all this global warming alarmism bullshit psuedo scientific bollox. You're so full of shit I can smell you from here. You stink arsehole.

  • @Galv140577

    And overpopulation deniers should practice what THEY preach

    and give up ALL their property and food to immigrants.

    What the overpopulation deniers do not have the mental capacity to comprehend,

    because they are all a bunch of fuck in the head christians and scientologists and muslims,

    is that anti-natalists support birth control and vasectomies to PREVENT killing once.

  • @mphello People who support depopulation should practice what they preach & go kill themselves.

    This is not about what people are "able to support" this is about the fact that there is a very real depopulation agenda in which this climate-stability-denying-man-­made-global-warming-alarmist propaganda is instrumental. The real "incredible evil & danger" is sick nutjobs who tell kids they need to die to save the Earth. BTW "Holocaust" means "burnt-sacrifice" you total friggin moron. Wake up!

  • @Galv140577

    = The eugenicist depopulationist propaganda is deeply intertwined with this carbon bullshit. =

    What a load of bullshit. People are able to support depopulation but not the other, and vice versa.

    What is an incredible evil and danger is sick nutjobs like you talking shit about groups of political activists

    deterministically, as if you "know" what all their beliefs are. That shit leads to the Holocaust.

  • @Galv140577

    And you are just part of the evil agenda that wants to force people into horrendously bad situations, so then they are forced to fight and steal from and kill each other, and then have the arrogant nerve to demand punishing them, rather than taking PREVENTIVE measures against such evil sick overpopulating overconsuming polluting agendas, funded by the evil sick mentally deranged Koch brother billionaires.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more