Why I Read the KJV Bible
Uploader Comments (theprolifeguy)
All Comments (166)
-
what is this a commercial? :)
-
@WayOfTheMaster454 But satan is working his way into the gospel and making it his own so eventually that scripture will be taken out also. God forewarned us not to take away from his words. (Rev 22:19) so nothing should be removed no matter what it says. Its the fact that acts 8:37 in the niv was taken out I dont care if it says comb your hair it should have not been taken out
-
@TRITCHEE --"The oldest and best manuscripts omit this verse". -New American Bible footnote. Also the NIV does in fact teach that faith is needed for salvation: Romans 5:1 for example.
-
Just for clarification: Many large portions of the Bible were translated into English starting around the yr 600 or so; And about Isaias 7 14, "almah" can mean a few things, BUT The Gospels give the true meaning, which is "virgin".
-
@kiwichristian2009 ATTENTION: EVRYONE DO NOT REPLY TO ANY OF KIWICHRISTIAN2009'S COMMENTS BECAUSE IF HE IS PROVEN WRONG ALL HE WILL DO IS STOP REPLYING AND WILL PUT THE SAME THING YOU REFUTED ON ANOTHER VIDEO. JUST IGNORE HIM, THANK YOU.
-
Since 1611, only the Scriptural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has stood the test of time. The same cannot be said for Wycliffe's translation, the Bishop's Bible, the Geneva, et al., etc. Moreover, every subsequent attempt at introducing a new English text to supplant the AV has invariably failed as a matter of historical fact.
-
too close; go further back.
.
Not being able to read ANY of those other languages is a fault.
.
You couldn't read the old English a few years back, so it is not too late to start Hebrew and obtain insights into the original bible intention.
.
Cheers.
from,
del-boy.
-
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 it is true to you because you want it to be true. Again, you will always find someone on the Internet who expresses a point of view that is similar to yours, but it doesn't mean it is true.
I agree with you that the KJV, also known as the Authorized Version is the best Bible for its consistency in phrasing and motives. I have just a question for you:
What do you thing about the KJV NEW CAMBRIDGE PARAGRAPH BIBLE HARDCOVER NEW? Is this the same as the KJV? if you have one, can you please tell me how is Daniel 11:14 written? Thanks in advance and save the babies.
KJVLover77 1 year ago
@KJVLover77 Well I am really not familiar with your version but my KJV reads "And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south ;also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision;but they shall fail"
theprolifeguy 1 year ago
Gerard Paul. You do think that not all other Bibles out there have perverted truths in them in comparison to
KJV. There are still a lot of other Bible scholars out there that make some of these Bibles like the NIV and others that love God as much as King James. To say that the KJV is the only one that you can trust is black and white thinking, I don't think that black and white thinking is the best approach to getting to know God, because it really is a little narrow.
jamesdragonforce 2 years ago
In the NIV Isa.14:12 they took the word "Lucifer" away & called Satan the morning star.But Jesus is the morning star 2Peter 1:19 & Rev. 22:16 .There is a link in the sidebar of the video to show KJV NIV comparisons..Of course reading any Bible is better than not reading any at all...To me the KJV is the one...God bless
theprolifeguy 2 years ago