@bonchie1 "there are numerous videos of the collapse where no explosions are heard. They would of been clearly recorded."
You obviously have no idea how loud the collapse was. No you aren't going to be able to pick up the sounds of the squibs in all that noise. Explosions WERE heard, however, constantly from when the planes hit to when the towers fell (which is when you'd be able to hear them). Explosions were also heard just before the collapse.
@bonchie1 Wow, so the pressured air that was able to smash through a fully supported skyscraper, in which half the support is in the outer wall, and take debris with it wasn't able to get past elevator doors? Why use 4-foot thick steel columns when we can just use thin, hollow elevator doors to support our towers?
@Alacazam777 Those doors would of been closed. The air would of rushed to the point where it would of been forced out and could no longer travel down, which is the bottom of the shafts at the sky lobbies. At that point it had nowhere to go but out after traveling downward through the shafts from the point of collapse. To say they were blasts of that magnitude ignores the fact that there are numerous videos of the collapse where no explosions are heard. They would of been clearly recorded.
@SvenTviking Yes, the fall of liquid metal was probably aluminum. But what about the pools of molten steel found underneath the rubble 2 and 3 weeks after 9/11? Aluminum (especially smaller amounts) cools much more quickly than steel... If it was just melted aluminum from the aircraft, it wouldn't still be hot liquid weeks later.
Oww this is just about discrediting critics,...
Kaandorpius 1 month ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
"9/11 was used to make billions and billions of dollars."
Uh, aren't we over a trillion dollars in debt?
dw1992 1 month ago
@KomatiPoort The only difference that I can see is that the WTC looks like a neater collapse than most other controlled demolitions.
Alacazam777 3 months ago
@Alacazam777 Watch a video of a building being demolished and then compare it to the Twin Towers falling. There's a clear difference.
KomatiPoort 3 months ago
@bonchie1 "there are numerous videos of the collapse where no explosions are heard. They would of been clearly recorded."
You obviously have no idea how loud the collapse was. No you aren't going to be able to pick up the sounds of the squibs in all that noise. Explosions WERE heard, however, constantly from when the planes hit to when the towers fell (which is when you'd be able to hear them). Explosions were also heard just before the collapse.
Alacazam777 4 months ago
@bonchie1 Wow, so the pressured air that was able to smash through a fully supported skyscraper, in which half the support is in the outer wall, and take debris with it wasn't able to get past elevator doors? Why use 4-foot thick steel columns when we can just use thin, hollow elevator doors to support our towers?
(Continued)
Alacazam777 4 months ago
@Alacazam777 Those doors would of been closed. The air would of rushed to the point where it would of been forced out and could no longer travel down, which is the bottom of the shafts at the sky lobbies. At that point it had nowhere to go but out after traveling downward through the shafts from the point of collapse. To say they were blasts of that magnitude ignores the fact that there are numerous videos of the collapse where no explosions are heard. They would of been clearly recorded.
bonchie1 4 months ago
@bonchie1 Then there would have been "squibs" on almost every floor (there's elevator doors on every floor).
Alacazam777 4 months ago
@Alacazam777 That's air rushing out of the elevator shafts in the sky lobbies lol....
bonchie1 4 months ago
@SvenTviking Yes, the fall of liquid metal was probably aluminum. But what about the pools of molten steel found underneath the rubble 2 and 3 weeks after 9/11? Aluminum (especially smaller amounts) cools much more quickly than steel... If it was just melted aluminum from the aircraft, it wouldn't still be hot liquid weeks later.
iGirlFriday 5 months ago