Indirect talks begin in Middle East

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
943 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 7, 2010

U.S. envoy to Middle East, George Mitchell, begins shuttling between Ramallah and Jerusalem Friday.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The whole purpose of "talks" is for the Israeli leadership to pretend they want peace and to make the Palestinians fight each other.

  • @EncompassedRunner jews are native palestinians too, without a doubt! They seemed to get along fine with their muslim and christian countrymen until the zionists arrived and started blowing shit up. Quit making excuses for ethnic cleansing you degenerate little nazi.

see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @CheeezMaster

    I meant "pretentious" to show the state of mind of the allies (western) after the war: "We just won the war, we can do whatever we want so we'll make a country for the jews in one of our colonies..." To me that's a pretty pretentious (as in "fuck the world, we rule!") and colonialist (as in "fuck ppl living there") idea.

    About the interests of having an Israel, I so agree with you, and would add that making sure that middle east doesn't fall to Russian socialism was also key.

  • @sinekonata Agreed. Right to transit and stay must be universal.

    That "pretentious colonialist idea"? The establishment of Israel was a masterfully executed move on the chess board by the western geopoliticians. This conflict not only achieved legitimacy for western domination/interference in the near east, a beach head into the Arab world if you will, it ensured weapons contracts, oil contracts, another client state... on and on.

  • @CheeezMaster

    I'm not saying remove people (in my perception of how things should work, people should be allowed to go wherever they want), I'm saying remove Israel: it was a pretentious colonialist idea to begin with, and has proven to be a pain in the ass bully since day one.

    End Israel, dissolve it, roll back to what Palestine was in 49 British sovereignty aside, and build a new country with whoever wants to go there.

  • @sinekonata Jews have human rights too. "Removing" Israel, as you would have us do, would infringe on said rights, and deepen the global human rights crisis.

    Get real or GTFO.

  • In the end, only one multi-ethnic state including Muslims, Christians and Jews is viable, the "two state solution" is long dead and these negotiations serve no purpose.

  • End Israel, it was a failure.

  • Mahmoud Abbas is a bend-over! in fact he will bend over backwards. Any Palestinian delegation with out the presence of Hamas is useless.

  • OH , indirect talks . In the muddle east. huh.? another 3 or 4 yrs of cover for Israels expansion. A way of deflecting attention away from Israels REAL agenda.

  • Nothing short of a peaceful dismantlement of the this racist cultist criminal parasitic entity called iZraHELL would ever suffice (similar to apartheid South Africa). If peaceful dismantlement is not successful due to opposition of the ZioNAZI cult that invaded Palestine from around the world specially Russia and Poland etc. This Cancerous parasitic entity should be forcefully punished and destroyed. Zionism is a satanic parasitic racist cultist filthy ideology.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more