Sorry, but i thought your handlng had several indiscrepancies. For example you never "magically" turn over the fourth joker - you go straight to the aces. And why lay 3 cards down but not the fourth, only to pick up the cards again. I dont know, just a little weird for me - i posted a video response also.
@PlaidStairs It is an elmsley count, allbeit a very diffucult application of it. It isnt your normal elmsley count, that's for sure
darkpenguincowboy 1 year ago
you shoulda named the Digital conviction by this name. afterwards i said, "NO F*ckin Way"
RamalCollins 1 year ago
the court is just not convincing enough..
stephen901113 1 year ago
Sorry, but i thought your handlng had several indiscrepancies. For example you never "magically" turn over the fourth joker - you go straight to the aces. And why lay 3 cards down but not the fourth, only to pick up the cards again. I dont know, just a little weird for me - i posted a video response also.
PabloBristly 2 years ago
its an elmsley count
fingerboarding007 2 years ago
What is it called when he shows us the jokers in the beggining?
PlaidStairs 2 years ago
Easy but great trick
Agemo66 2 years ago
u could use the elmsley, just, he did a different way of doing the same effect.
firedemon070 2 years ago