9/11 Truth Debunker Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Richard Gage 7/20/2009

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• richard gage
• 9/11 truth
• ae911truth
• federaljacktube
• federaljack
• us news
• truth
• bush
• inside job

[ally4free1]

@KDubVideos the thing that is wrong with your statement is the words towers ...he was not talking about the towers he was talking about building 7.. that was not hit by an air plane.. was taller than most citys tallest sky scrapers and yes it did fall at free fall speed ...6 seconds to be exact ...you should wake up to the truth of 911 ..it took me 10 years ..peace

[guppyelf]

@goldenknight777 i will say 2 that i know of,, 1 the tower inferno was based on a true story, it burned for days before they got control of it,, 2 the empire state building was hit by a flying fortress b17 bomber in the 40s. it was on fire for days, the plane that i mentioned is nearly twice the size of a 755 jet. and yet both buildings i mentioned still stand today,, kind makes a guy wonder. either crappy workmen ship on the towers or?

[junebickerstaff]

who to believe? it was still a horrible day no matter what

[bearcolombia]

Is the free fall speed argument is moot? Even if support columns were weakened by fire toward the base of building seven, does or doesn't tens of stories of resistance slow down the rate of fall compared to a free falling brick? And wouldn't the building tip a little instead of fall vertically since the debris destroyed only one side of the base of the building?

[TedBronson1918]

I'll end just saying it wasn't just 1 or 2 odd things happening that day- it was one thing after another and then some talking head would get on the news a month later and try to tell me that what I saw and heard didn't happen. They've been at it since. Lets hear Bush/Cheney testify UNDER OATH about that day. "Question Authority" applies here more than ever.

[TedBronson1918]

@youdoitillwatch When someone talks about planes impactin a building common sense tells one that the impact event INCLUDES the fires that may result. Pretending they're 2 different and separate events is dishonest and misleading. I'm not going to rehash free fall speed vs slowed speed arguments or the evidence of demolition vs collapse. I'll take the word of the NYFD personnel who were there and on video speaking to news crews. Believing them and my own eyes and ears is nuts?

[youdoitillwatch]

@TedBronson1918 First off, the impacts didn't bring the towers down, the fires started by fully fueled planes did. Second, the buildings fell straight down because that's the direction that things go when they FALL. (I'm not sure why I'm bothering. The people I've spoken with personally who believe as you do have all been nut cases.)

[TedBronson1918]

..so obvious! The NYFD down in the basement were reporting several more explosions as it was happening and even the press was reporting pools of molten metal at the site as told them by the NYFD. he federal gov't has been blowing smoke up the asses of the American people. Their own 'conspiracy theory' is the one that is the most unlikely of all that I've heard from anyone. They've lied about everything from 9-11 onwards. Something is very wrong here.

[TedBronson1918]

I watched the 9-11 mass murders happen from when it first popped up on TV. I recalled an interview I saw with the buildings architect before the WTC opened and he claimed they could withstand impacts from SEVERAL planes, not just one, because of the design. Fast forward to 9/11 and they both go down from a single impact (supposedly), and on top of that they collapse straight down. As I watched those buildings go down I said it was a demolition and not a collapse. It was so obvious! cont'd

[spartanjohn343]

Mmmm at 2:12 that nerdy guy just gots him some poon tang

[Mrgibbsy72]

This guy needs to get laid.

[booyalakasha1]

The force is strong with this video.