Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Real-time rendering in Octane render with 2x GTX480

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,505
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 11, 2010

This video was made by radiance (developer of Octane render) and demonstrates the amazing speed of Octane render while navigating in direct lighting mode on 2x GTX480 at 1280x720 resolution.

The Lamborghini Murcielago model contains 4M polygons and occupies 1GB VRAM including diffuse, specular and bump maps.

Machine specs
2x GTX480 in multi-gpu mode
CPU: Core2 Quad i7 920
6GB RAM
Thermaltake 850 Watt PSU
Windows 7 x64

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice , good demo! I must say that's a SEXY ass and Accurate Lambo, who modeled it? or is it of Turbo squid?

  • @letmego11 @tangletailpro IT's how raytracing works. Raytracing takes litterally an INFINITE amount of time but as time goes the noise disapear. You are the judge and you decide when to stop the rendering. The typical time for a rendering of a single frame is anywhere between 5 min and several days

  • que envidia me das :P

  • As fast as that is... I think I would rather stick with the logical rendering. The GPU rendering I see a lot of artifacts, while it does exist with CPU, it isn't the entire image.

  • @letmego11 try rendering anything using progressive path tracing and you'll have a pretty good idea of just how amazing this is and how far it goes in a flash - I just stumbled upon this vid and know absolutely nothing about Octane (yet :)), but I'd say this Lambo would be cooked in a matter of seconds.

  • Ok can someone help me with this; I see noises in the scene, and as the camera movement gets to a stationary position, the noises reduces, but there are still there and the image is not what you want to get as the final image. So if you want to get the final image how different the timing would be to get the best quality, anti-aliased image compared to the real time noisy image?

  • sick

  • i wish i had two gtx480s , the gtx260 is a little bit slower than this but it still works great! love this program, it got me back into design, thea render was too slow for me

  • Makes the same sense with Hypershot with cpu power

  • wow, is this rigg more powerfull than a tesla rig ?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more