NJ Transit ALP-44M #4427 leaving Red Bank NJ Wrong Pantograph Raised

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,788
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 2, 2008

NJ Transit ALP-44M #4427 leaves Red Bank NJ with a Westbound train bound for Long Branch NJ with the wrong pantograph raised.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (EMK623)

  • ok but their both built by bombardair

  • The first 15 ALP-44 locomotives were built by ABB Traction of Sweden. However Bombardier Transportation took them over in the late 1990's.

    Eric

  • whats the difference between both pantograph. why does engineers switch the pantograph up in push mode and the other pantograph in pull mode? if you understand my question

  • My best guess is to prevent the pantograph from snapping at high speeds. I don't know personally the exact reason why NJ transit is so picky about pantograph operation on there electric locomotives.

    Eric

  • Great video. Having the wrong pantograph up doesn't seem like it would be good for the wires or the engine...

  • There are occasions when NJ Transit does that. Normally its because either the engineer forgets to change it or the other pantograph doesn't work.

    Eric

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The aem 7's and the alp 44's are similar. Except the alp-44 has the ditch lights near the couplers and they have different radiator grils on the side

  • what is the difference between the ALP 44 and the AEM7???

  • @NJTFan78 There is no difference. Most trains fitted with two pantographs normally run with the rear one operating so that if it breaks or snags on the wires (pretty rare) it will not damage the leading one by falling onto it or bringing down the wires on top of it. that way the train may still remain mobile.

    Also, it was once thought that having the rear one raised provided better contact performance due to reduced aerodynamic interference. In reality there isn't much difference.

  • NJT can't run AEM7s because they don't own any AEM7s

  • ABB EMD? No they didn't, EMD built the original GP40 which was used for freight.

    Besides isn't the locomotive in this video an ALP-44? (ALP-44M Technically)?

  • asea brown boveri emd is built the freight gp40 which njt uses to pull passenger cars and built and design are most likely the same thing.

  • @Mushroom3727

    No

    The AEM7 was built by EMD and designed by ASEA

    The ALP-44 was built by ABB

  • Nevermind Mushroom3727. You're right the ALP-44M looks similar to the AEM7. But they're not the same thing.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more