Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Cardinal Wolsey

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,894
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2007

Excerpt from the historical monologue "400 Years of English History" presented by artist/historian George S. Stuart as part of an exhibit of his Historical Figures at the Ventura County Museum of Art and History in Ventura California. Visit the Gallery of Historical Figures online at http://www.galleryhistoricalfigures.com.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Cardinal Wolsey was not made Cardinal by Henry VIII; he was made Cardinal by Pope Leo X in 1515.

  • Wolsey would have been a better king.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The highest political position he attained was Lord Chancellor, the King's chief adviser, enjoying great freedom and often depicted as an alter rex (other king). Within the Church he became Archbishop of York, the second most important seat in England, and then was made a cardinal in 1515, giving him precedence over even the Archbishop of Canterbury. His main legacy is from his interest in architecture, in particular his old home of Hampton Court Palace, which stands today.

  • Thomas Wolsey (c. March 1473 – 29 November 1530; sometimes spelled Woolsey) was an English political figure and cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church. When Henry VIII became king of England in 1509, Wolsey became the King's almoner. Wolsey's affairs prospered and by 1514 he had become the controlling figure in virtually all matters of state and was extremely powerful within the Church.

  • @rookieninetynine Well, that is certainly technically correct, but then again Wosley could never have been made Cardinal if the King had objected to it -- and his influence certainly helped Wosley get the post. So, "being made Cardinal" by Henry can reference the implicit reality that Wosley would have never received the honor without the King's support.

    Sure, he should ideally be more clear, but Mr. Stewart is just storytelling the gist of history, not teaching a PhD course.

  • Ok, so he has this sort of folksy 'storytelling' style which holds the listener a little, but basically he either as Rosie2434 says misenterpreting things in a very wierd way or on occassion just getting things very wrong as Tudor Rose points out. I should also add that one is not a 'philanthoropher' but a 'philanthropist'.

  • great story teller,

  • Im terribly sorry but this gentleman seems to pop up all over the internet and especially youtube. As an Englishman and a keen historian I am frankly disgusted. Please someone educate this pompous arse!

  • Wolsey was, if it were not for the title, often referred to as the King by many... So practicly he was the king for a long period of time.

  • comment me back

    just moved new area kV

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more