Thermal recording of possible Baby bigfoot

A possible baby bigfoot is seen here on the ground looking up to a branch in a tree just before it leaps up and swings through the tree's.
A photo later of a person standing 5 foot 6 inches, has shown this possible baby bigfoot is about 4 foot tall.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Thermal_baby_bigfoot

[dartfish1]

Appears to be a rabbit to me. For most of the footage it seems to be sitting in profile facing to the left. At the :10 mark you can see what might be its ears at the top of its head. At :12 it looks to the right and then bounds off at :13 (you can see its back legs and rump). The shape and movement are very lupine. Size is hard to gauge in a video like this, but if I were to see this footage without the title of "possible baby bigfoot" I would assume it was thermal footage of a rabbit.

[replures]

When I recorded this clip, the subject jumped into the tree and bounded along the tree branches to the right.

Later when I went back to the area with a person for size comparison, and to look over the location better, we determined that the subject was around 3 foot tall, this was not a rabbit, one they don't climb trees, and two, I have recorded rabbits before with the thermal and the ears give off a lot of heat.

Thanks for your input though.

[dartfish1]

Do you happen to have any thermal footage of it bounding along the tree branches? That would certainly prove it wasn't a rabbit. I don't want to sound confrontational, but the only thing we have for estimated size and arborial nature is your statement. Nothing in the video substantiates your claim. Is this the entire video footage from the encounter? Trust me, I WANT it to be a baby bigfoot since I believe they exist. I'm looking forward to the day we have solid proof.

[replures]

This is the footage, after it takes the leap, I follow it to the right, you must look carefully as the thermal image is faint as it dots through the branches.

I apologise for my unstable cam, shaking and bouncing around.

[bootpdx]

Certainly a interesting vid. Would be helpful to record the same location during the day, provide a sense of scale. Thermals are relatively new to most people and everyday mundane animals look very different through them. Could be anything. Any guess as to why it jumped? Was it spooked? How did you know it was there in the first place? What made you turn on the thermal?

[replures]

The thermal was on already as me and a friend had been walking, and testing out a new type of bracket system for the thermal.

As we walked along we noticed in the veiwer the image in the thicket.

[redchun]

A squirrel?A deer? Have any of these people ever been in the woods or seen a wild animal?

[screamdr]

The speed at which the subject moves up, as opposed to sideways, tends to indicate that it is somewhat weightless in a higher dimension, and was therefore also likely invisible to the naked eye during the entire scene.

[LuminousBoutique]

bear.

[FinalBellyache]

Nice job by the way, except the not following part.

[FinalBellyache]

this juvenile went up the tree, why didnt you follow with the camera.

[seymourbbest]

Bigfooters are so pathetic---human footprints found along a shoreline become "juvenile bigfoot tracks" and any little scurrying thermal image becomes a "baby bigfoot". Using such crappy standards ANYTHING found in nature can be linked to the imaginary bigfoot. A candy wrapper found in the woods becomes"a hiker attacked by bigfoot and his candy taken".

[krakoose]

It's a deer.

[zaCHAry2269]

This is interesting. I Grew up in the woods, never seen anything move like that before. Cery quick. Where was this at? How often do you look and film?