**BREAKING** Al Gore confronted on Climategate in Chicago

THIS IS A RE UP LOAD FROM WE ARE CHANGE CHICAGO:
We Are Change Chicago confronts Al Gore at a Borders book signing on Climategate, carbon taxes, and the New World Order. Click the link for more info on the confrontation: http://www.wearechangechicago.com

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• al
• gore
• carbon
• tax
• cap
• and
• trade
• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• government
• club
• of
• rome
• united
• nations
• H1N1
• SWINE
• FLU
• MARTIAL
• LAW
• 666
• 2012
• satan
• antichrist
• christ
• ww3
• endtimes
• ron
• paul
• ufo
• jfk
• william
• cooper
• obama
• Freemasonry
• infowars
• chip
• mark
• the
• beast
• nwo
• new
• world
• order
• haarp
• false
• flag
• freemason
• cfr
• alex
• jones
• cnn
• glen
• beck
• nau
• zionist
• inside
• job
• skull
• bones
• bible
• god

[hellavadeal]

al gore is a trator.

death to the NWO

[Elinitsam]

Fuck You Al Whore! Fuck you and the New World Order!

[playk999]

See all the sheep line up! They will line up in the same fashion to be herded into their fema camps and they will enjoy it! SHEEP!

[durrrrhurrrrrr]

I remember being shown his movie in high school and being thrown out of class for questioning it.

[wheelori814]

those light bulbs also contain MERCURY, which when thrown away go into the dumps and then into the earth!

[thequietcanadian]

somany pissed off americans...just what they want

[lollercaust]

@dirksilver first off, not, it isn't, erring on the side of caution would make you a cautious driver since the odds of dying in a car accident are 1 in 6500. and...I drive a hybrid, how does caring about the environment make me a hypocrite?

scientists supporting the human impact on climate change are obviously not 1 in 6500. and I think I already asked backup to your claim. specially the claim that "personal liberties" are threatened by this, try again, try harder.

[dirksilver]

@lollercaust first off it's the same comparison and it's a good example because erring on the side of caution would tell us that regardless of how you drive there is a high chance of getting in an accident and dying.second it's also pollutes the environment making you a hypocrite

and again cite your claim of the majority as in post a link with the names of the so called majority because i think you're talking without really knowing.i've offered to back up my claims if you ask and not before

[lollercaust]

@dirksilver No, it's not ok to pollute sometimes, and I don't smoke (personal choice) it's ok to drive because I don't engage in risky behavior like drinking/driving in unsafe conditions/not maintaining my car, that's a more appropriate comparison than just "not driving".

regardless of what the IPCC is at "the heart of" the majority of climate scientists worldwide are on the side of humans impacting climate change.

seems like you "lost" the argument a while ago. good try though.