Part 2~CORRUPT NH Law Commission OVERRULES Supreme Court & decides Obama Eligibility Feat ORLY TAITZ

"CORRUPT" New Hampshire Elections Commission ignores the facts and KEEPS OBAMA ON THE BALLOT! Obot whatever4 attends hearing for the usurper! ORLY TAITZ

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• yt:stretch=16:9
• Part
• CORRUPT
• NH
• Elections
• Commission
• ignores
• the
• facts
• and
• KEEPS
• OBAMA
• ON
• THE
• BALLOT!
• Barack Obama
• New Hampshire
• Committee
• Conference
• Press
• Congress
• United States Congress
• orly
• taitz
• kenyanbornobamacorn

[tgear77]

@theonlyhabsfan John Locke and his friend Anthony Cooper, the Lord Shaftsbury, invested heavily in the Royal African Company, which had been granted a monopoly on England's enslaving Africans and selling them as slaves, in 1671. Locke sold his shares in 1675 for a large profit. There is your evidence of Locke's involvement of slavery. Check any biography on him and it will show that he did profit off the selling of slaves. Again, you lose, asswipe.

[tgear77]

@theonlyhabsfan What a moron you are. "The Law of Nations" is not included in the Constitution. Clause 10 has nothing to do with de Vattel's book. Anyone who could actually read English (let alone do the research) would know that. Let's look at this logically: the Founders are defining Congress' powers to battle piracy and a) crimes against the laws of other nations or b) crimes against a book. Which makes sense? Not forgetting that if writing a book's title, they would have....

[tgear77]

@theonlyhabsfan Again,.every treatise written on Clause 10 from Blackstone to present day fails to mention de Vattel's book. Why? Because the Founders were not referring to it when they were granting Congress the powers expressed in Clause 10. Speak to any lawyer versed in Constitutional law and watch them laugh their ass off at you. Asswipe.

[Lyric695]

@theonlyhabsfan I want to ask you an honest question in a calm and respectful manner and I would appreciate a calm and honest answer

Lets say that today the Supreme Court ruled that Natural Born Citizenship does not require US Citizen Parents and further ruled that President Obama is the legitimate President of the US having met all requirements for the office,

Would that be the end of it for you?

Would you then say well OK I guess that settles it the issue has been resolved?

[theonlyhabsfan]

@tgear77 - I mean look at your own comments here: You even show your lack of individual thought by repeating my statements! LMAO! :-). Well you made accusations against the dead man. A moral person would be able to support them! But then you can find the words Like Natural Born Citizen in a law when they don't exist? Ignoring words like Alien,Naturalization, Immigration and Collective Naturalization? It's certainly not I who is delusional! Again, Thanks for helping me prove my points! Evidence?