Muhammad Ali -VS- Ken Norton II 9/10/73 part 2

Muhammad ALI -VS- Ken Norton II

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• ali
• clay
• norton
• boxing
• sports

[djharris62]

I know Ken Norton he was a great fighter and great man. Ken never got the credit he deserved from media..

[cdmharley]

@cdmharley no sorry their first fight..

[cdmharley]

Ken norton broke Alis jaw in this fight 2 round

[29ungido]

@Oldsmobility455 mm norton's jabs are not lnding as much as you think yes the commentartors looked a little biased but look good enaough ali is avoiding those jabs

[MrPelavacas]

rocky doesnt no shit

ali clearly won this fight

no question bout it

ur right jess

[CassiusAli67]

I always wanted to see a 1966 Ali face off against Norton, Frazier, and Foreman.

[mjhaan]

@JESSICA132434 Couldn't agree more. Ali's jabs were timed perfectly and razor sharp. Ali won deservedly.

[capablemachine]

@Oldsmobility455 Well one of the commentators is Ferdie Pacheco, Ali's fight doctor.

[imaginaryband]

What a fight - In round 7 Norton's becoming incredible and Ali can't do enough, I just can't see at this point how Ali could win this fight. Surely he's got to be thinking "it's happening again - this guy is too good". Look forward to the next part of the fight!

[JESSICA132434]

if you look at the first 2 rounds closely when norton jobbed ali would pull his head back so the punches werent landing but they appeared to land because of the bad video quality

[futureproof28]

agree with you 100%.

[Oldsmobility455]

It's interesting to see how biased the commentary is. Up to this point in the fight I have it scored evenly, but the commentators say Ali is dominating. If you watch the earlier rounds, the punches landed are about even, and Norton is the aggressor. Then in the replay, the commentators make no mention of all of Norton's landed jabs.