Liam Is God

Liam's Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnrN4s1dFJ4

QualiaSoup's Video on Open-Mindedness: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/BewareOfGod

Vlog Channel: http://www.youtube.com/TheVloggingAtheist

WordPress: http://thebarkingatheist.wordpress.com/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/BarkingAtheist

Tumblr: http://thebarkingatheist.tumblr.com/

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• liam
• god
• atheism
• thebarkingatheist
• liamjr24
• deity
• open-minded
• credulity
• religion
• flying
• spaghetti
• monster
• fsm
• celestial
• teapot
• russell
• bertrand
• qualiasoup
• Zsadlfkjasdiagrb
• atheist

[TheBarkingAtheist]

@amylouie1 I'm the next Justin Bieber. Or Rebecca Black. Actually, I'm the bastard son of Bieber and Black, even though I'm older than both of them.

[gr8z0mbiejesus]

@NeCacaluXuxultic well technically he is wrong, but the mayans and the incas met pretty disasterous ends because they thought a Conquistadore (de gama? not sure) was the god Quetzacoatl

[CapQuacer]

Even the term of the bibical god is vague, because some people will not cling to a litteral 6 days, while others will not.

[TheBarkingAtheist]

@HomoCyborgZombie

Evolution may be a bad example.

I know that fairies don't exist, because there exists no evidence for their existence, and because the concept is made up, but I could be proven wrong tomorrow. Highly unlikely, but I could be.

I'm not going to sit there and say like you, "I don't believe, but I don't know, even if I think it's unlikely to the point you don't have to consider at all, because it's irrational to say otherwise," just because there's a POSSIBILITY.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@TheBarkingAtheist Evolution could be disproven tomorrow.

You want to know how things are worded?

"The evidence suggests that evolution is happening".

Not "It IS 100% certain evolution is happening!" as you would think.

What's your point? To prove mine that things are never absolute?

Other wise, there you go again, failing.

Because when you have the possibility, even with all the odds against the idea of a god existing, you can not kill an idea with 100% certainty.

[TheBarkingAtheist]

@HomoCyborgZombie

So because I don't give much, if any, credence to the smallest POSSIBILITY in something means that I'm saying 99=100? No. You are misrepresenting my argument and missing the point.

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that at 99.99999999999...999999%, you might as well say 100% for a semantic reason, or as they would say in mathematical terms, rounding!

You can't be 100% about ANYTHING with your logic, so I might as well not say I know evolution is real.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@TheBarkingAtheist And again, you failed math class.

Just because the chances are small, does not mean you can ignore them. In a practical life, nobody cares and can throw these out without a care.

But don't pretend you're smarter when you say 99%=100%.

Because you've shown how wrong you are when you mistake certainty for most likely.

[TheBarkingAtheist]

@HomoCyborgZombie I KNOW that fairies don't exist. I KNOW that Harry Potter is fiction. I KNOW that the Celestial Teapot was made up by Bertrand Russel. I KNOW Narnia is fake. I KNOW these things, because of the lack of evidence in favour of them. I could be wrong. I could utterly wrong. What are the chances of me being wrong? Negligible, at best.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@TheBarkingAtheist You do understand by saying "I know" at any time, just with a clarification of "I could be wrong", is just lawyer talk, right?

You will win the lottery!*

*or not

You'd rather say you're certain with an asterisk, than actually say "No I don't know".

You're only convincing yourself.

[deah99]

Free Hamza Kashgari! 

[DDogsK]

Dude, you're awesome, however in 20 years time a wormhole will carry you back to the late 1980's and you will become Max Headroom.

Keep Up the great work.

[SecularMentat]

The one REALLY sharp point on this is that "Where there is no evidence *WHERE THERE SHOULD* be evidence is evidence of absence."

Which is a pretty strong case. When we can define god in such a way where think there should be some evidence, and cannot find it...that would definitely provide strong evidence against the existence of god.