Harry Potter MIdnight Showing-Review Half-Blood Prince
Uploader Comments (AmazingCowMan)
All Comments (21)
-
LOL cool eyes man !
-
@beck232608 oh yates thought it was a bit boring so he added it for effect
-
@1BWSTYLE8 god yeh you are so right.. incidentally have you seen the dh what did you think
-
you got that right.. i hadnt previously seen any potter films or books.. after seeing the hbp was intreaged enough to go and get the whole set and the last two books.. you are right they left loads out important stuff to.. tell you what is really bizarre yates added the burrow scene to spice it up, why when there was all that snape and death eater scenes missing i have no idea
-
Do attend a midnight premiere do you have to order the tickets then go there or can you buy the tickets when you get there please answer this fast i wanna attend the deathly hallows part1 midnight premiere
-
They actually did a horrible job on knowing the characters. Harry would never get with a random muggle girl at a diner and wouldn't bring a wizard newspaper to a muggle cafe. Should of been protected by the Dursley house instead to fit the situation of all the attacks. He also would never listen to Snape quieting him or just watch Dumbledore die. Hermione also wasn't as studious as she should of been because she found nothing on the Half-Blood Prince. Movie dumbed the characters to one dimension
-
dude ur reallly HOTT!!!!!!!!!!
-
it was a good movie but not a good adaptation from the book. The end was the most disappointing. They completely cut out the battle because they said it was too repetitive since there is a battle at hogwarts in number 7. In the book harry was under his cloak and couldn't move but in the movie it looks like he just stands there and lets Dumbledore die. I didn't get the Burrow scene at all. The burrow is in the next two movies so it can't be destroyed.
-
nice review. I totally agree but I have a theory on why the made the voldemort stuff a secondary part of the movie and the romance the main part even though it was the opposite in the book. I think they did that because the 6th book is kinda a filler book and it would be really repetitive if the talked about horcruxes and voldemort constantly for 3 movies. Most of what harry learns from Dumbledore can be explained in the next two movies when Harry, Ron and Hermoine are looking for Horcruxes.
For starters, they didnt go back and show the blood line of VOLDEMORT, they didnt show how Harry was so attached to his potions book, didnt show how they found out that Snape was the half blood prince until the very end, didnt show how Dumbledore stunned Harry under the Invisibiliy cloak when he was killed, and they didnt show the funeral of...I think not showing the funeral was an insult to his memory, and they didnt show the final battle.
Habboplayer2 2 years ago
So true...
AmazingCowMan 2 years ago
there is one thing people who have read the book keep forgeting harry was not stunnd by a spell he was just so shocked that he could not move.
moviemad51 2 years ago
Rofl. You talking about in the train? Read the book again Malfoy did petrificus totalus. If you're talking about at the end with Dumbledore, yeah he got stunned by Dumbledore so he wouldn't do anything. Read it again.
AmazingCowMan 2 years ago
Meant to add that I've even completed the video game on the PC, thought that was really easy, what about you have you played it ?
repro99 2 years ago
Yes we have the game for Xbox 360 because me and my brother are real fans, it's a pretty good game but the game play is fairly short.
AmazingCowMan 2 years ago