Keith Olbermann Reports on ColorofChange.org's Drive Against Beck & His Advertisers

(Via http://www.mediamatters.org ) Olbermann reports on Color of Change petition against Beck and advertisers who have bailed on him.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Keith Olbermann
• Glenn Beck
• colorofchange
• advertisers
• media matters

[rocksiphone]

@brewmiester78 Great Comment

[brewmiester78]

its funny that this was all debunked not one of those companies was even a sponsor... LOL the fact the he has GAINED sponsors shows that George Soros owned Media Matters and MSNBC are in bed together about making up LIES and calling it news to use as propaganda for the progressive socialists agenda

[brucepig]

If Glenn Becks popularity is proof that he is right about his hysterical scaremongering then the popularity of liberal ideas and socialized healthcare in Europe and the UK means the numbers trump the views of you Beck fans. If popularity of Beck gives his fantasies credibility then you have to accept that the popularity of government run health care trumps Becks rambling because of it's almost unanimous popularity in the wider Western world.

[eldictator1]

Its just a bunch of propaganda buzz words for stupid gullable lay-people, all they hear is communist, czars and then the green bill and make an assumption that the two are linked

[eldictator1]

Popularity doesn't mean anything.

[xylin3]

Yeah but they're not on TV...

[xylin3]

So while it doesn't "mention" czars, He has THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to create and appoint them.

You really need to Stop watching Beck. This is a great example of how He is Misleading You.

[xylin3]

Article2

Section 2.

"He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for"

[zeratul1987]

lol google my friend. Simply google the term czar and educate YOURSELF a little. I have studied the Bolshevik revolution in detail I know what the term means and that is why I find it shocking the ignorant apply this term to in valid situation, czars in the context you are using is completely false and misleading, in presidential context it simply means an expert in that field. How would the term you use apply in a system with numerous czars? Several supreme leaders? THINK!

[AHamiltonFederalist]

you have proved my point perfectly! You obviously have never watched Glenns show cause he backs up everything he says! he has a judge on all the time to talk about how the things obama is doing are unconstitutional!

You might be dumber than I thought but do you even know what I am talkting about when I say czar? Its obamas term not mine. He appoints czars over all kinds of stuff in the economy (car czar?). It is unconstitutional! czar means monarch! it is called economic fascism...