Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Vi and Sal Talk About the Mysteries of Benford's Law

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,051
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 23, 2011

Vi Hart visits Khan Academy and talks about Benford's Law with Sal

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It's so weird to hear Vi's voice when it's not at 1000 words per minute

  • Guys, Sal is married and has a son lol.

see all

All Comments (107)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • pleaaaaase Sal don't bring anyone next time

  • the baddest thing that u did is 

  • You were thinking of Luxembourg.

  • Sealand is the country with the smallest population.

  • Montenegro is a country.

  • Hey guys, I wondered what would happen if this was shifted to another base, for example binary (hmm 100% on 1, how odd :D) and found an amazing thing when shifted to octal ... on 1000 iterations of 2^n 1,2 and 4 had equal (33.3333% odds) of being the first digit - not a single 3,5,6 or 7 I suppose this is the "why" you wanted us to ponder.... though what it means I'm not sure ... maybe counting with our thumbs was a bad idea?

  • ...At this point it is increasing ten times faster than it was originally, but has exactly ten times as much ground to cover between 10 and 20 as it did between 1 and 2, so it will spend the same time there, then the same amount of time between 20 and 30 as between 2 and 3 etc.

    That should give you a good idea of the scale invariance problem, which is what most seem to struggle with.

    I advise using Wolfram|Alpha to graph e^(-x) from x = 0 to 5, then (separately) from 5 to 10. ..Look familiar? ;p

  • The logarithmic relationship should be true for every base, but the graphs would look different.

    The relationship applies to numbers that are generated by most natural systems, and as Desrathedemon states, it's all about exponentiation.

    Say a number is increasing a rate which is proportional to its own magnitude.

    Starting at one, it will increase slowly, then increase double as fast at 2, then double as fast again at 4 etc until it reaches ten.... (read on in next comment)

  • Would this still work in a non base-10 numeral system?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more