Gurdjieff Sacred Dance - Pythagoras 4

beautiful

Absolutely stunning, precise, deeply moving. Inspiring a sense of stillness whilst in motion. The paradoxes come alive.

the problem with this is that the group is choreographed to be in sync, like a BackStreet Boys video. With G. you dance on your own and when everyone "feels" it, then it is in sync. you can't force this dance, or any other Gurdjieff's dances. once everybody gets "it", it looks otherworldly. I don't know how Osho taught, it could be that the people involved are attempting to mimic what the dance should be, if so... good try.

the main difference between Osho and G. is that there seems to be some central theme or substance behind the G. movement. Osho, just like most of his followers, just seems vague in inconsequential, though nice and pretty to the eye.

Please, There is someone who knows what they said? thank you

What a man who really wants to understand and to be must do is separate a man from the idea and impulse. It is incredibly hard cuz masters are mostly a fine ground for mysticism and fantasy. That is almost the ultimate goal.People who cant do it still have a sindrom called "my dad is stronger then youre dad". Fight with it.

It is strange that people still are looking for comparation and critics that only reflect the emptness mirroir of oneself.

I apreciate any effort of breaking with time and trying to join infinity !

Thanks Gurdjieff, Osho and everyone undertaking such experience on oneself.

about this osho-gurdjieff polemics, let's be honest: osho read gurdjeff but never created these dances. osho just gave his ok to his followers' creations.

osho allowed almost anything his westerners followers wanted, as long as you could give some spiritual meaning to it. if his commune/ashram/resort was full of young artists and therapists, then it is not surprising that art and therapy would acquire a spiritual undertone. perhaps, this explains why gurdjieff became so popular..

are u joking?

Osho is a student of Gurdjieff! :)