Climate Change Deniers will be "Marginalized"
Uploader Comments (UpTakeVideo)
Top Comments
-
ITS DUE TO THE SUN the carbon tax is to fuel the NWO!! wake up!!
All Comments (63)
-
President Obama is pleased to scratch the backs of the flag-wavers, in doing so outlining his agenda, which isn't to be underestimated. International "green race" = arms race, ie. bloodless battle for supremacy and influence. "...the naysayers will be marginalised..." Ladies and gentlemen, we are witnessing a major assault on the commonly held concept of freedom of speech and expression in the name of an ideaology that cannot be properly scientifically proven by way of comprehensive testing.
-
@UpTakeVideo Joke. Climate Change research is funded by corporations standing to make a killing off carbon trading schemes and doomsday fears.
Asking climate change scientists for an objective view on this is like going to a church and asking all the priests for an objective view on the existence of God.
If the earth is warming it's due to solar variation. If it's man then we're really fucked. Your stupid Kyoto porotocol only served to industrialize more third world people, GGE have RISEN.
-
@swtjonesy they try to warm it up with chemtrails and haarp now... oh boy... no aluminium for me, thanks.
-
What Planet are they living on? Our Planet is cooling. I for one will be proud to stand in the free thinking margins.
-
@UpTakeVideo Petr Chylek, Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia---"Scientist who want to attract attention to themselves, who want to attract great funding to themselves, hve to (find a) to scare the public..."
-
@senatorvreenak33 The term GW was the term that was constantly used to focus the people on this idiotic hoax. Then the cold winters started to break records and they felt stupid calling it only GW--thus back to the drawing board. Climate change covers all bases--if it snows, if it melts , if it heats up if it remains the same, climate change can always be used. But the climate of earth has never remained the same and the arrogance of man to think we can control it is astouding and typical.
-
@joskemom the term climate change has been in use for decades. See IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on CLIMATE CHANGE) created in 1988, far before Al Gore had anything to do with the public face of climate change. Also see these video for more reason why you're arguments have no basis in reality v=mqMunulJU7w
-
An increase in free carbon dioxide in the air is impossible due to green plants
-
The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) is done, stick a fork in it. The biggest investors were Goldman Sacks and, damn, AL Gore's Generation Investment Management group. All that money that could of been made from this dumbass scam.
-
@UpTakeVideo No, they term climate change started to be used because Al Gore was getting embarrased about having his global warming talks cancelled because of the blizzards a few years ago. I used to call it a hoax but my term is the global warming scam. Oh and the only polar bears are risk are the animated ones in Big Al's docufictionary.
why is it called climate change now? what happened to global warming? PR campaign. its hard to say global warming when the world has been cooling for a decade isnt it?
swtjonesy 2 years ago 7
Climate change is the term used because people have been confusing weather with climate. Climate refers to long term trends as opposed to weather which is a snapshot at a point in time. And no, the world has not been cooling for a decade, particularly at the poles where ozone is thinnest and we've lost a huge amount of ice.
UpTakeVideo 2 years ago
This comment from swtjonsey accidentally deleted: yes, the world is cooling. i like your answer to the PR accusation though, well done. but back to the video. is obama making a threat to china and india? is he suggesting we "marginalize them"????
UpTakeVideo 2 years ago
The scientific debate about global warming is over. Just like there are a few folks who will tell you the world is flat, there are a few of non-peer reviewed "scientific" studies that will assert there is no global warming. That "science" is generally funded by corporations who stand to lose if actions to stop climate change are taken. Obviously if they pour enough money into spreading disinformation they are going to sweep up people who don't understand the science, but see it as politics.
UpTakeVideo 2 years ago