80386 playing MP3 at 8khz 16kbps.
Uploader Comments (ThePDI)
All Comments (26)
-
Do it faster by defrag the HD!
-
@javier29m90 lol
-
if you turn off all visualization effects could you maybe play a higher quality file. What is the highest quality mp3 you can play on this w/o issues?
-
@thelyniezian The coprocessor is little more than just a floating-point unit, something that's been intergrated into CPUs since the 486! (about 1990)
-
ah good old times of ISA cardbus ..:D
-
can this run 128kbps ?
-
I'm frankly quite surprised MP3s will play on anything this old, though I suppose the co-processor explains it.
But... Gina G? Why? (That if anything brings back the memoies of the 90s I guess, admittedly...)
-
OK, seriously, it was ess you bee. The first three letters of submarine. What?!
So if I was describing a sandwich made out of a baguette, or using that prefix for any other situation, or talking colloquially about marine vessels that travel below the surface, I'd get filtered out?
Rewriting the missing part ("2b", I guess):
(or low end 486s anyway) because you could extract the audio from HQ files,
-
By the way, as it could output to WAVfiles, I have a feeling they only even allowed mp3 playback on sub-486 (or
Right, deleting a word at a time. It's not mp3, or HQ, so ... what is it? Am I going to have to actually start at the end and work backwards, slowly deleting stuff, until it works?
the visualization has no impack on de CPU speed, because the CPU wait more for decoded processing from the coprocessor. larger kbps gives more floating point time wiche cause the sound lagg.
I've also tryed other FPU's like Intel, IIT, Cyrix fast Math. and model type like 80387 4C87DLC
DLC's for cyrix early 486's was the fastes. Intel was at that time slow
It's also explain the pentium 60 Mhz vs 80486DX4 133Mhz. and if you know Quake I ,pentium's FPU beats 486 FPU runs much better
ThePDI 4 months ago