@wolffe93 And the Japanese showed off by doing what they did during the war. Also, read @crackhead2777888 's comment below. If you read his explanation on the matter, the bombing saved more lives of both sides. The toll was heavy with fighting in Europe already they didn't want more casualities. Bombing was necessary. Maybe it was to "show off" but Japan did the same thing. Only to 3.9 Million innocent people. You still never proved that this was terrorism. It was not terrorism it was war.
@gluesticksareawesome even if that's true, would it make any difference if they bombed down random cities?
how many of those torturers would actually live in hirshima and nagasaki?
no, my friend, that's not the reason why the bombs fell, the only reason was that the usa wanted to show off, they wanted to show the rest of the world how much power they had, and they didn't care if innocent lives were blown out, as long as they weren't their own tax-paying citizens
I think dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely necessary. I think Harry Truman was doing what was best for America. Think about how many Japanese and Americans would have died in battle. Look at Iwa Jima(however you spell it) the Japanese were going to anything to protect their homeland and it would have stretched the war into many more years and it would have cost Japan and America a massive amount of lives I thought it was best for America.
@wolffe93 Keep in mind, Japan was a FUCKED up place during WWII. If you know, they've tortured, murdered women and children, raped, and destroyed culture and lives of many other Asian countries. They were a mad dog at the time and they needed to be put down with brutal force of an atomic bomb. 200,000 dead at nagasaki/hiroshima? Think of 3.9 million chinese that were killed at the hands of the Japanese.
That was war, this is terrorism, They ARE different. America had a purpose to bomb.
@wolffe93 Uhhhhh....JAPAN was at WAR when that happened, does it make it any better? Of course not, but Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were acts of terrorism when the US was NOT at war.
i love how america keeps bitching about 9/11 and pearl harbor, when the actual amount of people who have been killed by the us government is a multiple
just to let you know; victims of pearl harbor and 9/11: about 2000 each
victims of hiroshima and nagasaki: about 200 000 all together
@wolffe93 And do you think Japan cared about who they slaughtered either? You're saying America doesn't care, but look at it equally on both sides.
gluesticksareawesome 2 months ago
@wolffe93 And the Japanese showed off by doing what they did during the war. Also, read @crackhead2777888 's comment below. If you read his explanation on the matter, the bombing saved more lives of both sides. The toll was heavy with fighting in Europe already they didn't want more casualities. Bombing was necessary. Maybe it was to "show off" but Japan did the same thing. Only to 3.9 Million innocent people. You still never proved that this was terrorism. It was not terrorism it was war.
gluesticksareawesome 2 months ago
@gluesticksareawesome even if that's true, would it make any difference if they bombed down random cities?
how many of those torturers would actually live in hirshima and nagasaki?
no, my friend, that's not the reason why the bombs fell, the only reason was that the usa wanted to show off, they wanted to show the rest of the world how much power they had, and they didn't care if innocent lives were blown out, as long as they weren't their own tax-paying citizens
wolffe93 2 months ago
I think dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely necessary. I think Harry Truman was doing what was best for America. Think about how many Japanese and Americans would have died in battle. Look at Iwa Jima(however you spell it) the Japanese were going to anything to protect their homeland and it would have stretched the war into many more years and it would have cost Japan and America a massive amount of lives I thought it was best for America.
crackhead2777888 2 months ago in playlist More videos from undertakerfreak1127
@wolffe93 Keep in mind, Japan was a FUCKED up place during WWII. If you know, they've tortured, murdered women and children, raped, and destroyed culture and lives of many other Asian countries. They were a mad dog at the time and they needed to be put down with brutal force of an atomic bomb. 200,000 dead at nagasaki/hiroshima? Think of 3.9 million chinese that were killed at the hands of the Japanese.
That was war, this is terrorism, They ARE different. America had a purpose to bomb.
gluesticksareawesome 2 months ago
@DeftonesFan867 so?
as you said yourself, it does not make it any better
war is just a word, it does not mean that the usa HAD to murder so many innocent people
wolffe93 3 months ago
@wolffe93 Uhhhhh....JAPAN was at WAR when that happened, does it make it any better? Of course not, but Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were acts of terrorism when the US was NOT at war.
So try again and use proper logic.
DeftonesFan867 3 months ago
i love how america keeps bitching about 9/11 and pearl harbor, when the actual amount of people who have been killed by the us government is a multiple
just to let you know; victims of pearl harbor and 9/11: about 2000 each
victims of hiroshima and nagasaki: about 200 000 all together
wolffe93 3 months ago
it is the freemasons and illuminati and these fags trying to ruin the image of muslims and arabs
QatarnehChannel 4 months ago