LT Solenoid 2

The Lee-Tseung Solenoid, as close as I could get to experiment001.

Of course, I chose to demonstrate the device suspended as a pendulum, rather than scooting (or inching, or millimetering if you prefer) along on a desktop. I have no doubt that this device would also scoot on a desktop a bit, because it would have something to push against in that case. But if it was tested properly, by placing it on a smooth piece of glass of equal mass, which in turn rests upon some smooth ball bearing balls on a level granite surface plate, the center of mass of the system formed by the solenoid and the piece of glass would also NOT MOVE. The solenoid will go one way, the glass plate will go the other, showing that momentum is conserved and the device scoots across the desktop by friction and reaction forces. Hence, it will not work in space or even in air or suspended as a pendulum as shown here, because in those cases, there isn't anything to push against and the device isn't ejecting any mass from its system.
For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. Almost always.
Momentum is conserved.
Always.

And I am afraid that in this case, with this device, the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out Theory has found no support.
It is completely implausible, nay impossible, for a system of this sort to provide lift, propulsion, or maneuvering capability to a "flying saucer" as alleged by certain posters on certain internet forums.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Lee
• Tseung
• Lead-Out
• Theory
• reactionless
• propulsion
• solenoid
• flying
• saucer

[mascobe]

I think you need to produce double the magnet strength in order to act on the magnet enough to separate them. My guess is that you would also nee to produce a magnetinc field in the separating metal part and reverse the poles. Example: -/+ -/+ -/+ -> -/+ +/- -/+ (-/+ = magnet). A simple way to do this would be a split iron core (a gap in the separator block) with two coils wrapped in opposite directions and just switch between the two.

[TinselKoala]

Yes, that has been suggested. However, I am not trying to prove the LTLOT, I was testing a specific hypothesis involving a particular configuration, trying to show that under the conditions specified, no anomalous thrust was produced. So I did.

I have recently constructed a suitable driver circuit and will be performing various experimental variations of the experiment. Watch this space (but be patient.)

--Trust, but Verify--

[TinselKoala]

Umm. I'll have to refer back to that when (if) I'm ever sober, er, not too busy.

Seriously, it sounds like a good experiment to try, and I'll put it in the input buffer.

Thanks.

[AdminOnDuty]

Note: The magnet should NOT strike the end in the experiment I outlined. :D

[AdminOnDuty]

So even though there is a conservation of momentum, there is a cumulative shift of reference due to a separation of time.

[AdminOnDuty]

...frequency. Increase the amplitude of the signal to afford moving the magnet to the end. Apply a positive going signal of F and a negative waveform of F/2 for each cycle. attach a laser pen to your coil perpendicular to the tube and mark its point where it strikes the wall across the room. Energize the system and mark the outside edges of the laser travel. Compare them to the center mark. See if they are lopsided in accordance with the time deviation of F/2 for the return path of the magnet.

[AdminOnDuty]

The center of mass must be moving off center and then returning to that position on reset. This is because the magnet is pushing off the magnetic field which is coupled to the coil. If the magnet is thrust to right, then the coil must be thrust to the left. However, F=MA applies and the greater mass means a lower acceleration in the same time period. So it becomes possible to accelerate the magnet at a speed that prohibits coil movement. Lengthen the tube to one full wave length of the applied..