Why Dating Methods Can Date Nothing

Radiometric dating methods rely upon circular logic, such as calibration curves and dating fossils by rocks by strata by fossils by rocks by strata. When employing dating methods, evolutionists toss out dates which dissagree with the assumed age of something only to publish the date that seems to come closest to their assumption. You are never told about the dates which dissagreee with their assumptions. They are not scientific and ignora several scientific observations which make it clear that they are worthless.

The Unikaret lava formation near the bottom of the Grand Canyon has been dated at
10,000 YA
117 MYA
1.39 BYA
2.6 BYA
853 MYA
1.1 BYA
715 MYA

The University of Arizona has discovered Native American tools have been found in the lava Unikaret lava formation, which they state were put there between 800-1,000 yrs old.

Samples from the 1986 dacite flow on Mount St Helens, Washington were K-Ar tested to a date of 350,000 years old! answersingenesis . o r g / tj / v10 / i3 / argon . a s p

Mt Ngauruhoe erupted several times in the past 25-50 years and several of these samples have been K-Ar dated to ages of 250,000 -- 3,500,000 years old! This is an 1,000,000% error! answersingenesis . o r g / creation / v22 / i1 / dating . a s p

Diamonds are the hardest substance known and can not be penetrated with contaminants. Evolutionists teach diamonds formed millions or billions of years ago out of carbon deep in the crust. If this is true than the radioactive 14C should be undetectable after 100,000 due to its fast decay rate. Diamonds were sampled from 12 locations all over the world and they contained measurable amounts of 14C. icr . o r g / carbon-14 /

CreationismCoal supposedly formed millions or hundreds of millions of years ago according to evolutionists but coal samples have also been tested and they also contain measurable amounts of 14C. These results support what the Bible says about the young age of the Earth and the world wide flood. icr . o r g / rate /

Radiometric dating methods use a material of pressumed age as a control for calibration, such as a rock of assumed age or an index fossil (of assumed age). There is nothing imperical about dating methods. To this are added "fudge factors". Dating methonds are circular logic and incapable of dating anything because they do not use a material of empirically known age for calinration, and are therefore incapable of providng a date for anything.
The sun produces C-14 in the upper atmosphere, and at the same time it decays which removes it from the Earth. Because the Earth has not acheived C-14 equalibrium but is instead still increasing, which would take approximately 30,000 yrs, C-14 verifies the fact that the Earth is less than 30,000 yrs old.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• NephilimFree
• radiometric
• dating
• methods
• carbon
• 14
• age
• of
• the
• earth
• creation
• evolution
• uniformitarianism
• charles
• lyell
• darwin
• dawkins
• lear
• uranium
• strontium
• polonium
• potassium
• debate
• science
• strata
• rocks
• flood

[guitardivababe]

Since I couldn't really stay focused on this for long im only 13 could you tell me what is he debating

[NephilimFree]

@guitardivababe The dating methods scientists use to claim the earth is millions or billions or years old are flawed systems and cannot provide a date for anything. Science proves the flood of Noah is truth.

[bonerman345]

I find no google scholar citations for Edward Boudreau and find no chemist Edward Boudreau at this unnamed "university of New Orleans, Louisiana". It would be interesting to read some of these claims in peer-reviewed research journals.

[NephilimFree]

@bonerman345 The university of New Orleans is not "un-named", not is he.

[ThatOtherHeretic]

Neph, do you happen to know where this video segment came from, from what documentary or program?

[NephilimFree]

@ThatOtherHeretic Drama in the Rocks

[guitardivababe]

Thanks Alot that helps because my bio teacher wanted my class to watch this and we didn't get it at all .

[complexadaptive]

@NephilimFree His name is misspelled in the subtitles to the video, without the x, I stand corrected..

[NephilimFree]

@complexadaptive He's actually a chicken catcher, not a PhD chemist. Shhhhhhh. Don't tell anyone.