Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

New Feathered Dinosaur!

This is the latest spectacular fossil to come out of China in recent years. Damn that Xing Xu- lucky bastard! Clarification fo some terms: basal = more primitive, branched off early from the main ...  
 
Customize

More From: TheProf1988

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to No sense pretending
35 ratings
Sign in to rate
287 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (26)   Options

Loading...
Albukhshi (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you have interesting ideas, but not stupid ones. don't worry about "excommunication"

the only example of "excommunication"/ extreme ridicule I know of in paleontology are those clowns from oregon state university (Ruben et al.); you too would be severely ridiculed if you said that the feathers on sinosauropteryx's feather were from a bird under the fossil XD

or Archaeopteryx was a cold blooded animal. (wtf?)

or that Respiratory turbinals are the ONLY requirement for endothermy, etc.
GWolfV2 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Many millions of years ago

"Gary..Gary, you fell out of the tree and landed on me...Gary?"

Rick the bird was too traumatised to push Gary's body off him and starved to death. It all makes sense
Albukhshi (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Hehe

+1
GWolfV2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No, I think the evidence firmly points to therapods at least being the ANCESTORS of birds. But, from my own view of some things, I put it more in the mammal like reptiles/synapsids where while there is a grey area, you'd be justified in separating the true birds from the dinosaurs. I base this partly on the way dinosaur and bird bodies, while similar, were clearly designed for different functions

Just my own, very uninformed opinion,.
GWolfV2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I would also say that while I think the evidence is pretty conclusive as to the link, I don't agree with the practice of looking at modern day birds when trying to figure out behaviour (eg, looking at that well known Tenotosaurus with Deinonychus find and determining the dromaeosaur behaviour based on bird behaviour) given I think behaviour's main controls are sex and food. Therapods occupied a very different niche to all flying and probably all/most ground birds today, and their habits would be
GWolfV2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
again, in my very uninformed opinion (not being modest, I'm just dense) controlled by the advantage for their lifestyle than their relatives. Eg, some dismiss the concept of pack behaviour based on comparison with modern birds. But, no bird would fill the niche of medium sized major ground carnivore which hunts prey larger than itself, generally. And since pack behaviour can be primarily instinctual, a large brain would not be an automatic indicator. Just a thought or five ^_^
TheProf1988 (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Ahh, so you place birds as a sister taxon to the bird like therapods instead of nested firmly within them?
GWolfV2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes, pretty much. You say in one line what I not say in many
Albukhshi (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
interesting idea you have.. very interesting.
Albukhshi (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
interesting ideas.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.